Comparison of grazed and protected mountain steppe rangeland in Ulukisla, Turkey

  • Published source details Tukel T. (1984) Comparison of grazed and protected mountain steppe rangeland in Ulukisla, Turkey. Journal of Range Management, 37, 133-135.


A study was conducted on the hills of Ulukigla (a county of Nigde Province) central-south Turkey. The area comprises typical steppe (1,350 m altitude) with a semiarid climate. Floristic composition and vegetation yield was compared in a 36,690 ha area protected from grazing since 1947 (i.e. 30 years at the time of study), with an adjacent public grazing area heavily grazed by livestock.

Four different slope aspects in both areas were selected to represent the soil moisture gradient present.
Vegetation data were collected at the beginning of grazing period in spring 1980, and at the end of the grazing seasons in 1979 and 1980. On each slope, eight 20-m long transects were established. Vegetation cover, composition and species frequency data were recorded at intervals along each transect. Herbage yields were estimated by cutting plants at ground level in 20 randomly thrown 0.1 m² quadrats at each location. Crude protein content of the dried material was determined.
Soil infiltration rate was measured at each location by a double ring infiltrometer.

Total vegetation ground cover (less than half that in the grazed, average 12.5%, than in the ungrazed, average 26.7%, area), composition, and dry forage yields were significantly less on the livestock-grazed hills. Two grasses (sheep’s fescue Festuca ovina and the annual, bulbous meadow-grass Poa bulbosa var. vivipara),a sage shrub Salvia criptantha and a perennial forb Asphodeline isthmocarpa were the species responsible for the the main differences in the ground cover.
Salvia criptantha (5.9% in the grazed area; 1% in ungrazed area)and thyme Thymus squarrosus (2.4% in grazed area; 4.3% in ungrazed area)dominated the grazed area vegetation, and F.ovina and P.bulbosa dominated the protected area.
These results indicate that palatable forage grasses were replaced by less palatable shrub species in the heavily grazed area, and that secondary succession was still taking place in the protected area.
The grazed and ungrazed areas did not differ significantly in infiltration rate averaged across all slope aspects (protected - 20.5 cm/h; grazed - 22.1 cm/h).
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 20

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered speciesVincet Wildlife Trust