Discing and seeding effects on sod bound mixed prairie

  • Published source details Hart M., Waller S.S., Lowry S.R. & Gates R.N. (1985) Discing and seeding effects on sod bound mixed prairie. Journal of Range Management, 38, 121-125.


Much native Mixed Prairie in Nebraska (central USA) is degraded due to livestock overgrazing, with resultant shortgrass communities dominant. Previously these grasslands would have been dominated by mid- and tall-grass species, primarily big bluestem Andropogon gerardii. This study in Nuckolls County, evaluated the ability of existing desirable, native species to increase in degraded prairie following rest from grazing and/or soil discing, and combined with native seedings.

Vegetation was dominated by short-grasses. Cool-season species were primarily western wheatgrass and Kentucky bluegrass; warm-season species primarily blue grama Bouteloua gracilis and buffalograss Buchloe dactyloides. Within blocks, treatments (and controls) were randomly assigned to 23 x 11 m plots (4 replicates):

Discing - one plot in each block disced (8-10 cm depth) on 1 May 1979. Cover (plants, litter and bare ground) was determined in late May 1979, 1980 and 1981 using a point frame. Four quadrats (30 x 60 cm) per plot were clipped in May, July and October (1979-1980) to estimate standing biomass.
Discing and seeding - plots disced (as above) and drill seeded with a mix (30 PLS (pure live seed)/0.1 m): big bluestem (25%), little bluestem Schizachrium scoparium (30%), indiangrass Sorghastrum nutans (10%), switchgrass Panicum virgatum (l0%) and sideoats grama Bouteloua curtipendula (25%).
Discing, herbicide and seeding - plots disced (as above) sprayed with glyphosate (1.1 kg active ingredient/ha) on 7 May and drill seeded 12 May 1979. Plant suppression was about 90% 10 days after spraying.
Herbicide and lo-till sod seeding - on 7 May 1979, glyphosate was applied. Plant suppression was about 60-70%. On 12 May 1979, a power-till seeder was used to ‘sod seed’ a mix (30 Pure Live Seed/0.1 m) of: big bluestem (35%), indiangrass (15%), switchgrass (15%) and sideoats grama (35%).
To assess seedling establishment, frequency of occurrence within 160 (30 x 30 cm) quadrats/plot was recorded in August 1980 and July 1981. Above-ground standing crop was assessed in September 1982.

Vegetation cover of controls (26.4%) in 1979 was dominated by Kentucky bluegrass and blue grama (14.0%). Discing reduced cover to 12%. Cool-, warm-season and total vegetation cover declined from 1980 to 1981 in both control and disced plots (primarily due to 48% lower than average June-September 1980 rainfall, as well as litter build up). Discing did not induce a shift to desired grasses; in the second and third growing seasons, warm-season shortgrasses in fact increased relative to controls.
In lo-till sod-seeding with glyphosate seedling establishment was rapid for all four ‘desirable’ warm-season grasses sown (66% frequency all species, 1981).
Whilst establishment was slower in the two other seeded treatments, both were deemed to produce adequate grass stands by 1981: drill seeded disced plots (53% frequency) or disced plus glyphosate (60%).
Yield was similar for seeded treats (6.8-7.6 Mg/ha) by September 1982 (controls 5.0 Mg/ha).
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 19

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust