Study

Autumn mowing or spring burning fails to induce a shift towards native Mixed Prairie plant communities on degraded grassland in the Loess Hills near Harlan County Lake, Nebraska, USA

  • Published source details Schacht W. & Stubbendieck J. (1985) Prescribed burning in the Loess Hills mixed prairie southern Nebraska. Journal of Range Management, 38, 47-51

Summary

Poorly managed (e.g. overgrazed) degraded rangelands (now dominated by non-native cool-season grasses, and low yielding warm-season shortgrasses) are common in the Mixed Prairie region of central-north USA. This study evaluated the potential of a late-spring prescribed burn (near Harlan County Lake, Nebraska) to shift vegetation composition back to the mid and tallgrass species more indicative of native Mixed Prairie, such as big bluestem Andropogon gerardii, little bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium, switchgrass Panicum virgatum, and sideoats grama Bouteloua curtipendula.

The study was conducted in three native rangeland tracts of low vegetation condition on silt loam soil; dominant cool-season species were generally Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratensis and annual bromes Bromus spp., and dominant warm-season species were blue grama Bouteloua gracilis and buffalograss Buchloe dactyloides.
 
At each tract, treatments (autumn mowing, late-spring burning or untreated controls) were randomly allocated to plots (8 x 15 m) within each of three blocks. On autumn mowing designated plots, in September 1979 and 1980 vegetation was mown to 5 cm height and cut material removed. Prescribed burning (backfires) of burn plots took place on 25 April 1980.
 
Basal cover and relative species composition was measured (using point frames) in August 1979 (prior to treatment application) and subsequently in August 1980 and 1981. During the 1980 and 1981 growing seasons, plot herbage yields were determined (hand-clipping in sample quadrats) in early June and late September.
 
Precipitation during the 1980 growing season (April-September) was only 57% of the long-term average (550 mm).

Autumn mowing failed to produce the desired species shift; over the 2-year study period it did not significantly affect relative composition of the dominant grass species.
 
In two tracts supporting substantial amounts of warm-season shortgrass species, burning led to initial suppression of cool-season grasses and significantly higher yields and basal cover of the warm-season shortgrasses (reduced competition from the fire-damaged, cool-season grasses). Due to the reduction of the cool-season grasses, the soil moisture in burned plots was also relatively high at the time warm-season grasses initiated growth. On the third tract, with almost no warm-season native grass remnants, those warm-season mid and tallgrasses present did not increase but there were significant yield and cover increases of invasives.
 
The authors suggest that one major reason for a lack of a shift towards native mid and tallgrass species was due to the dearth of native remnants as a recolonising source. Also, precipitation in the 1980 growing season (April-September) was only 314 mm (i.e. 57% of the long-term average) which may have reduced responses to treatments.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: https://www.uair.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume38/Number1/

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust