Study

Broadcasting grass seed to revegetate sandy soils

  • Published source details Kocher E. & Stubbendieck J. (1986) Broadcasting grass seed to revegetate sandy soils. Journal of Range Management, 39, 555-557.

Summary

In the Nebraska Sandhills region (central USA), crop cultivation under center-pivot irrigation was widespread during the 1970’s. Many marginal sites have subsequently been abandoned, leaving large areas of exposed sandy soils. Revegetation is needed to prevent further erosion and expansion of these areas. This experiment, undertaken in Custer County, assessed the effects of tillage, irrigation level, seed coating and species (four native perennial bunchgrasses) on grass establishment.

On abandoned cropland, tillage treatment comprised plots shallow disked a day prior to seeding, or untilled (forage sorghum stubble residue remaining). Irrigation (in tilled and untilled sub-plots; 2 replications) comprised water applied in three equal amounts (15-17 July, 21-22 July, and 27-29 July, application dates based on moisture stress) in 60 m width circular bands at a total of 0, 2 or 4 cm of water.

From 11-13 May 1982, seven hand broadcast seeding treatments (24 replicates each) were applied in 18 m² sub-sub plots of the tillage by irrigation treatments: sand bluestem Andropogon gerardii var. paucipilus (hand broadcast at 32-39 seeds/m²) and little bluestem Schizachyrium scoparium (at 72-116 seeds/m²) seeds coated with a lime and nutrient slurry at three rates (heavy, light or zero).
 
A seed mix of non-coated switchgrass Panicum virgatum (27 seeds/m²) and sand lovegrass Eragrostis trichodes (18 seeds/m²) was also broadcast.
 
Seedling density was measured on 24-25 September 1982, 7 June 1983 and 15 August 1983.

Seedling establishment was consistently higher for all seeded species on the disked than non-disked areas in all sampling periods (establishment percent of seeds - disked: September 1982 - 6.0%, June 1983 - 5.0%, August 1983 - 5.1%; untilled: September 1982 - 3.8%, June 1983 - 3.3%, August 1983 - 3.6%).
 
Whilst the amount of water applied was only a small proportion of that available during the growing season (precipitation in the 1982 growing season was 36 cm), establishment increased as irrigation increased; a linear response occurred indicating that timing of irrigation (at peaks of water stress) was important.
 
At each sampling period, establishment of sand bluestem (4.8., 4.2 and 4.2%) and little bluestem (5.5, 4.3 and 4.4%) was similar. Establishment of the switchgrass-sand lovegrass mixture was a little less (3.3, 3.2 and 3.3%).
 
Seed coating had no influence on establishment being washed off soon after sowing by rain, thus any effect it may have had on survival was lost.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: https://www.uair.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume39/Number6/  

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 19

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust