Study

Response of a semidesert grassland to 16 years of rest from grazing

  • Published source details Brady W.W., Stromberg M.R., Aldon E.F., Bonham C.D. & Henry S.H. (1989) Response of a semidesert grassland to 16 years of rest from grazing. Journal of Range Management, 42, 284-288.

Summary

Much desert grassland in southeastern Arizona (southwest USA) has been subject to livestock grazing for over a century. National Audubon’s Appleton-Whittell Research Ranch Sanctuary (3,160 ha of desert grassland and oak Quercus woodland) had livestock removed in 1968. Prior to1968 it was moderately cattle-grazed yearlong. Adjacent (and similar) areas support continuous moderate livestock grazing thus providing an opportunity for study of vegetation response to livestock removal. Both areas are grazed by white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus and pronghorn antelope Antilocapra americana.

In 1969 in a 400 ha area of the Sanctuary (Bald Hill), 25 (10 x 10 m) permanent plots (approximately 400 m apart, marked with steel posts) were surveyed. Within each, canopy cover of vascular plant species was estimated in 10 randomly located (40 x 40 cm) quadrats. The plots were resurveyed in 1984.
 
In 1984, a second study location (Sanctuary Border) was selected to allow comparison with an adjacent continuously grazed area (Manila Allotment). The Allotment has been grazed yearlong with 120-140 head of cattle since 1910 (comparable to this Sanctuary locality prior to livestock removal). Six plots were established at 120 m intervals along the Sanctuary border fence. Two 20 m transects were located on each side of (and parallel to) the fence at each plot (30-35 m from the fence to reduce possible fenceline effects, e.g. cattle concentrations). In each transect, canopy cover was estimated in 20 (20 x 50 cm) quadrats. Species were grouped into midgrass, shortgrass, forbs, and shrubs.

Vegetation changes on Bald Hill 16 years after livestock removal included increases in total vegetation cover (29% in 1969 vs. 85% in 1984) and species richness (diversity). In 1969, 22 species were recorded in quadrats, compared to 49 in an equivalent sample size in 1984.
 
In the Sanctuary Border area on both sides of the fence, cover of midgrass, shortgrass, forb and shrub species groups significantly increased; total vegetation cover was similar between grazed and ungrazed areas. Cover of midgrasses was significantly higher in the Sanctuary (primarily due to increased plains lovegrass Eragrostis intermedia). No such differences were apparent for the other species groups. Blue grama Bouteloua gracilis became the most abundant species on livestock grazed and non-livestock grazed areas.
 
Observations of vegetation cover increases (in both grazed and ungrazed transects) suggest that longer-term changes in vegetation may be occurring due to factors other than livestock grazing (e.g. precipitation).
 
As well as increases in plant species diversity observed in the Sanctuary, diversity of animal groups studied (birds, small mammals and grasshoppers) also increased subsequent to livestock removal.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: https://www.uair.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume42/Number4/

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 19

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust