Study

Effects of single season and rotation harvesting on cool- and warm-season grasses of mountain grassland in Roosevelt National Forest, Colorado, USA

  • Published source details Jameson D.A. (1991) Effects of single season and rotation harvesting on cool- and warm-season grasses of a mountain grassland. Journal of Range Management, 44, 327-329

Summary

Colorado Front Range (USA) mountain grasslands typically comprise 25-50% warm-season plants, and the remainder cool-season species. Some long-term large mammal exclosures have nearly pure stands of cool-season species indicating that grazing may promote a good mix of warm- and cool-season species. This study, undertaken at 2,800 m altitude in theRoosevelt National Forest,assessed effects of single season and rotation harvesting on cool- and warm-season grasses.

The study was undertaken in a mountain bunchgrass community (ungrazed by livestock for 6 years; large mammal grazed mostly elk Cervus elaphus in winter) dominated by cool-season Parry oatgrass Danthonia parryi (48% of grass/sedge cover) and warm-season slimstem muhly Muhlenbergia filiculmis (39% cover; warm-season grasses made up 40% of total grass/sedge cover). Sedges Carex spp. contributed 0.5% cover.
 
Treatments were early (June 15) partial harvest of cool-season grasses and late (July 15) partial harvest of warm-season grasses. The first phase was initiated in 1986 and evaluated in 1988, and repeated in during 1987-1989.
 
There were the 40 treatments (8 schedules x 5 harvest intensities i.e. an estimated 10, 30, 50, 70 or 90% of the weight of species being clipped in l m² circularplots mimicking different grazing intensities) with 15 replicates of each. Forbs were pulled from plots. As a measure of grass response, biomass in plots were clipped in mid-August and separated into cool- and warm-season species. Samples were dried and weighed.

Warm-season grasses were greatly reduced by repeated July harvest, slightly reduced by July harvest in alternate years, and increased slightly in June harvest plots of cool-season grasses. Warm-season grass weight declined from about 9 g/m² with strong (70-90% clipping intensity) early harvest treatments to about 6 g/m² with strong late harvest treatments.
 
Dominant cool-season grasses responded less to repeated early harvests than did the less abundant warm-season grasses to repeated late harvests. Cool-season grass weight increased from about 18 g/m² (strong early harvest treatments), to about 24 g/m² (strong late harvest treatments).
 
The author states that the results strongly suggest that early or rotation grazing is necessary to achieve a good balance of warm-season and cool-season grasses in a mountain bunchgrass community.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: https://www.uair.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume44/Number4/

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust