Study

Herbaceous plant control and protection from insect herbivory enhances emergence and first year survival of blue oak Quercus douglasii and valley oak Q.lobata in oak savanna, California, USA

  • Published source details Adams T.E. Jr., Sands P.B., Weitkamp W.H. & McDougald N.K. (1992) Oak seedling establishment on California rangelands. Journal of Range Management, 45, 93-98

Summary

In California hardwood rangelands (south-west USA), recruitment of blue oak Quercus douglasii and valley oak Q. lobata is poor. These rangelands comprise grasslands with scattered trees and are often of considerable wildlife value. Strategies to enhance oak recruitment are required. Experiments were undertaken in six north-central Californian counties (between latitudes 35º15’-39º15’N) on representative sites to assess the effect of herbaceous plant control and protection from small mammal and insect herbivory on acorn emergence, and seedling survival and growth.

Acorns were collected locally in late summer-autumn. In November-December 1985-1988 on eight sites (five blue oak, three valley oak), acorns were sown within fenced exclosures to exclude deer, feral pigs Sus scrofa and livestock (know to browse seedlings/eat acorns).
 
At each site, treatments were herbaceous plant control by herbicide application (glyphosate, atrazine and/or oxyfluorfen) and hoeing, vs. naturally occurring vegetation as main plots: each main plot (4 replicates) comprised 100 acorns planted at 5 cm depth in four rows of 25 each at 30 cm spacing.
 
Seedlings were randomly split into: protected (against small mammal and insects) and unprotected. Protection comprised ‘window screen cages’ (close-topped cylinders 15 cm diameter x 40 cm high) or rigid plastic seedling protectors (mesh screens) 5 cm diameter x 30 cm high (these replaced cages when threat of grasshopper Melanoplus devastatorherbivory was minimal, as these might otherwise pass through the mesh). Hairnets (as used in the food processing industry) were used to protect seedlings against grasshoppers in 1986 at one site.
 
Rainfall and soil factors were recorded to help interpret seedling emergence, survival and growth.

Some acorns and seedlings were eaten by (larger) small mammals at all locations. Pocket gophers Thomomys bottae were common and control was undertaken where considered a significant threat, but losses still occurred. Black-tailed jackrabbits Lepus californicus, rabbits Sylvilagus spp. and ground squirrels Spermophilus beecheyi were suspected as major causes of browsing damage.

Herbicide application (reducing competition for moisture by other plants) was the most important factor in enhancing seedling emergence: blue oak - 45% with herbicide, 28% no herbicide; valley oak 64% with herbicide, 50% no herbicide. Highest emergence of blue oak occurred when there was above average rainfall.
 
Average seedling first year survival was significantly higher in herbicide plots: blue oak (33% vs. 18% of acorns sown), valley oak (45% vs. 21%). Screening significantly improved survival: blue oak (average across 3 sites) - screen (no herbicide) 34%, screen (+ herbicide) 46%, no screen (no herbicide) 26%, no screen (herbicide) 41%; valley oak (average across 4 sites) - screen (no herbicide) 28%; screen (+ herbicide) 54%; no screen (no herbicide) 18%; no screen (herbicide) 46%.
 
Growth was also significantly improved by screening. Window screen cages proved best, also producing some shade which may have enhanced survival and growth further (although this possible beneficial effect was not measured).
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: https://www.uair.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume45/Number1/

 

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust