Conservation Evidence strives to be as useful to conservationists as possible. Please take our survey to help the team improve our resource.

Providing evidence to improve practice

Individual study: The effect of different fire regimes on plant diversity in southern African mesic grasslands at the University of Natal research farm, KwaZulu/Natal, South Africa

Published source details

Uys R.G., Bond W.J. & Everson T.M. (2004) The effect of different fire regimes on plant diversity in southern African grasslands. Biological Conservation, 118, 489-499

Summary

Fire may be an important component in managing grasslands for grazing mammals and maintaining grassland diversity. However, the effects of fire in southern African grasslands are poorly understood. In this study, the effects of long-term burning treatments on biodiversity in mesic grassland was investigated.

Study site: The effects of long-term burning treatments on  mesic grassland was investigated at the University of Natal research farm, Ukulinga (840 m.a.s.l.), 8 km south-east of the town of Pietermaritzburg.

Burn treatments: Plant diversity was examined under a range of burning treatments in a randomly allocated, replicated block design. The treatments were:

1) biennial (i.e. two years between fires) and triennial autumn burns;

2) annual, biennial and triennial winter burns;

3) annual, biennial and triennial spring burns;

4) no-burn.

Each treatment was replicated in three 14 m x 18 m plots for 48 years. During burning, a back burn was lit on the down wind side of the plot and a head burn lit on the opposite side. The head burn was carried across the plot by the prevailing wind, until it met the back burn.

Sampling: The importance-score method was used to sample plant diversity, providing estimates of species richness and abundance. A series of concentric nested sub-quadrats (1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 m²) were used, measuring from the smallest to largest sub-quadrat size. Each plant species was awarded a score depending on the first sub-quadrat in which it was encountered. Thus, the first encounter of a common species should be in the smaller sub-quadrats (the 1 m² quadrat holding a score of 7), whereas of a rare species in the larger quadrats (the 100 m² quadrat holding a score of 1). Average species richness was calculated for each treatment for the 1 and 100 m² quadrats.

Species richness showed no consistent, clear responses to frequency or season of burning. Comparing species compositions, no-burn treatments had different communities to burn treatments, with more woody species being present. When no-burn was removed from the analysis, the communities separated out according to block and not burning regime. Also, the sod-forming grasses Aristida junciformis, Cymbopogon excavatus and Tristachya leucothrix decreased with increasing fire frequency, whereas the bunch grasses Themeda triandra and Diheteropogon amplectens increased with increasing fire frequency.


Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: http://www.environmental-expert.com/magazine/elsevier/biocon/index.htm.