Preliminary response of Sandhills prairie to fire and bison grazing

  • Published source details Pfeiffer K.E. & Steuter A.A. (1994) Preliminary response of Sandhills prairie to fire and bison grazing. Journal of Range Management, 47, 395-397.


This paper reports preliminary response of sandhills prairie vegetation to spring and summer prescribed burns, and their interaction with bison Bison bison grazing. The study was conducted in 1991 and 1992 at the Niobrara Valley Preserve in Nebraska, north-central USA.

Experimental sites were located within a 3,000 ha pasture grazed year-round by about 250 bison since 1986. Sandhills prairie occupies 90% of the area (dominated by perennial, warm season grasses, primarily, sand bluestem Andropogon hallii, prairie sandreed Calamovilfa longifolia, switchgrass Panicum virgatum and little bluestem Schizachyrium scopurium).
Approximately 500 ha were burned in two prescribed burns in early May (spring) 1991 and another 100 ha in late July (summer) 1991.
Vegetation was sampled at ‘sands range’ sites only (i.e. the prevalent and most productive Sandhills upland sites). Plant species composition and standing crop were recorded in 40, 1 m² paired plots (bison excluded from one of each pair by a wire cage) randomly located in burned and unburned areas during the 1991 (early May burns only; regrowth in July burns was not considered sufficient to warrant sampling) and 1992 growing seasons. In 1992, the cages were relocated (May and July burned areas 14 paired plots each; unburned areas 12 pairs).

The main findings were that at the end of the growing season, standing crop of rhizomatous grasses was increased by burning whilst bunchgrasses generally decreased.
Summer burning did not affect rhizomatous grass standing crop, but substantialy reduced that of bunchgrasses (1992: spring burn 7.6 g/m² grazed, 22.5 g/m² ungrazed; summer burn 1.5 g/m² grazed, 4.6 g/m² ungrazed). On burned areas, bison grazing reduced bunchgrass standing crop by 56%, but reduced rhizomatous grass standing crop by only 18%. Forbs generally appeared unaffected by grazing (individual species were affected variously by burning).
Thus maintenance of Sandhills prairie bunchgrasses may be dependent on fire exclusion. With burns, replacement of bunchgrass by rhizomatous grasses may increase available forage, but accordingly may increases susceptibility to wind erosion.

Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:


Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust