Study

Cheatgrass competition and establishment of desert needlegrass seedlings

  • Published source details Rafferty D. & Young J.A. (2002) Cheatgrass competition and establishment of desert needlegrass seedlings. Journal of Range Management, 55, 70-72.

Summary

In semi-arid regions of the US Great Basin, where habitat is disturbed by construction, contractors are required to attempt to revegetate such areas using native plants. Revegetation often fails due to competition (primarily for moisture) from an invasive annual, cheatgrass (drooping brome) Bromus tectorum. In very dry areas, the perennial desert needlegrass Achnatherum speciosum has potential for use in restoration projects.In a greenhouse study in Reno (Nevada, southwest USA), the effect of cheatgrasscompetition on desert needlegrassseedling establishment was assessed.

Desert needlegrass was grown in a greenhouse with five different densities of cheatgrass (four replicates of each); densities were derived from field sampling at a site in the Dog Skin Mountains (35 km north of Reno) where needlegrass establishment was desired along a pipeline route.
 
Seed was sown in cylinders (95 cm deep x 30 cm diameter) filled with soil from the pipeline at the following densities: 1) 100% of field conditions (283 seeds/cylinder); 2) 75% of field density (212 seeds); 3) 25% of field density (71 seeds); and 4) no cheatgrass (control).
 
The soil was saturated prior to sowing and the surface soil kept moist until seedling emergence. No more watering took place until week 7 when seedlings of both grasses exhibited severe moisture stress. Needlegrass height was recorded weekly for 12 weeks following emergence.

During weeks 1 to 4 there were no statistically significant differences in average needlegrass seedling height among the five treatments. Subsequently, from week 5 to 12, there was a highly significant difference in needlegrass height between the controls (week 5, 9.9 cm; week 12, 13.9 cm) and those sown with cheatgrass at all densities (tallest seedlings were in 25% cheat grass density: week 5, 7.5 cm; week 12, 6.3 cm). However, even at the lowest cheatgrass grass density (equivalent to 25% of field density) needlegrass seedlings were prevented from establishing. Thus to allow desert needlegrass to establish in the field, some form of cheatgrass control is probably required where cheatgrass is present.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: https://www.uair.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume55/Number1/

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust