Study

Response to cool-season prescribed fire of two semi-arid grasslands in the Bernalillo Watershed and Cibola National Forest, New Mexico, USA

  • Published source details White C.S. & Loftin S.R. (2000) Response of 2 semiarid grasslands to cool-season prescribed fire. Journal of Range Management, 53, 52-61

Summary

Grasslands are prone to shrub and tree invasion where natural mechanisms (e.g. fire or grazing) which retard their establishment are reduced or lost. In southwest USA, large areas of semi-arid grasslands have become scrub-invaded in response to reduction of livestock grazing. Two shrubs in particular, burroweed Isocoma tenuisecta and broom snakeweed Gutierrezia sarothrae have invaded millions of hectares. Whilst prescribed burning may assist grassland restoration, there is a risk of increasing erosion and soil degradation as vegetation cover is greatly reduced for some time post-burn. In this study within Cibola National Forest (New Mexico), effects of burning semi-arid grasslands were investigated.

The study was undertaken at two sites where broom snakeweed was the dominant shrub:
 
1) Bernalillo Watershed (1,660 m; livestock grazing ended 1947); prescribed fire 15-16 November 1995, about 168 ha burned;
 
2) West Mesa (1,820 m; livestock grazing ended early1970s); prescribed fire 14 February 1996, burns confined to treatment plots (4 ha).
 
At each site, eight, 1 ha plots (4 control, 4 burned) were established. Along three 60-m transects (central plot area to avoid edge effects) vegetation cover, bare soil, litter, gravel and rock was recorded on four occasions (before burning, within 3 months (Bernalillo) or one month (West Mesa) post-burn, and after the first and second growing seasons). Soil samples were collected (at these times) according to cover-type (shrub, grass or bare soil) and analysed for various properties.
 
Runoff-sediment collectors (3 x 10 m) were installed in plots at both sites.

Before burning, vegetation cover (total 36-38%; grass c. 20%; shrubs 12-14%) was fairly sparse and patchy; all cover-types declined from May 1995 to February 1996 (during a period of drought). Grass cover reduction was greatest in burned plots, but not significantly less than controls. With the return of the rains, total vegetation and grass cover increased from February 1996 to January 1997. One year post-burn, grass cover had recovered to almost that of the controls; after 2-seasons cover was similar.
 
In 1997, shrub cover was slightly less than prior to treatment commencement but appeared unrelated to burning as values were similar for control (8%) and burn plots (7%).
 
Over the 2 years, potentially mineralizable soil N was similar on control and burn plots (lack of effect may be due to ash being blown away); it was greatest in soils under shrubs, slightly lower under grass and lowest in bare soils. Sediment transport was also similar in control and burn plots (there was a non-significant trend toward higher sediment yields in burn plots)
 
The potential for adverse effects from fire was enhanced due to the drought following burning. However, any effects of burning were overall minor compared to controls.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: https://www.uair.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume53/Number1/

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust