Study

Spittlebug and buffelgrass responses to summer fires in Mexico

  • Published source details Martin-R M., Cox J.R., Ibarra-F F., Alston D.G., Banner R.E. & Malecheck J.C. (1999) Spittlebug and buffelgrass responses to summer fires in Mexico. Journal of Range Management, 52, 621-625.

Summary

In Mexico, the spittlebug, Aeneolamia albofasciata (Homoptera, Cercopidae), is the most economically detrimental insect herbivore of buffelgrass Cenchrus ciliaris. Buffelgrass (native to Africa) was introduced to Sonora in 1954 to increase productivity in semi-arid regions of northern Mexico. Although the focus of this study (undertaken on the Carbo Livestock Research Station, Sonora) was to use summer burning to reduce spittlebug populations in buffelgrass, results may serve to identify best prescribed burning management practice to retain spittlebugs in areas where buffelgrass itself is considered a pest.

The five treatments were applied to buffelgrass pasture:
 
1) an unburned control;
 
2) burning 7-14 days before summer rains when spittlebug and buffelgrass inactive;
 
3) burning after the accumulation of 5 cm of summer rainfall during spittlebug egg hatch or buffelgrass second leaf stage;
 
4) burning between the second and third instars or early grass culm elongation;
 
5) burning between the fifth instar and adult stages or peak buffelgrass growth during the summer.
 
 
Effect of treatments on different lifestages of spittlebug and and growth and motality of buffelgrass were recorded over 4 years.

Summer burning after accumulation of 5 cm of rainfall and between egg hatch and the third instars or between the second leaf stage and early culm elongation totally eliminated spittlebug nymphs and adults. Additionally, buffelgrass growth appeared stimulated for 3-4 years post-burn. Burning at the peak of buffelgrass growth, whilst also effectively controlling spittlebugs reduced grass production by almost 50% for 4 years post-burn. In the untreated control, nymph and adult spittlebugs killed more than 50% of the buffelgrass.
 
An advantage of summer burning conducted after the first rains was that fires were easier to control than those undertaken before the growing season when vegetation was dry.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: https://www.uair.arizona.edu/holdings/journal/issue?r=http://jrm.library.arizona.edu/Volume52/Number6/  

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust