Sowing native tussock species in high altitude revegetation trials

  • Published source details Dunbar G.A. (1970) Sowing native tussock species in high altitude revegetation trials. Proceedings of the New Zealand Ecological Society, 17, 25-32.


In the Canterbury Mountains of South Island, New Zealand, revegetation trials were established at two eroded mountain sites to study establishment, growth and survival of four native tussock grass species when sown with or without cover nurse crop species.

At Porter's Pass (975 m) on 20 October and Craigieburn (990 m) on 25 October 1967, five cover treatments (non-native species) with four replicates were sown (broadcast) in plots (size not given) at a rate of about one seed per square inch (2.5 x 2.5 cm):
1. No seeding (control);
2. Inoculated white clover Trifolium repens (Huia cultivar);
3. Chewing’s fescue Festuca rubra commutata;
4. common bent (browntop) Agrostis tenuis;
5. Yorkshire fog Holcus lanatus.
Twenty seeds of each of four native tussock species (mountain danthonia Notodanthonia setifolia, blue tussock Poa colensoi, hard tussock Festuca novae-zelandiae and silver tussock Poa laevis) were planted just beneath the soil surface. Within each plot a total of 80 seeds of the four species were sown (400 seeds within each replicate; 1,600 seeds/site). Fertiliser was applied to each plot.
At Porter's Pass, tussock seedling survival and growth was recorded in December 1967, May 1968, September 1968 and April 1969, and at Craigieburn in May 1968 and May 1969.

Mountain danthonia seedling emergence was very low (3% germination). The other three species did better: blue tussock (Porter's Pass 35%, Craigieburn 14%) hard tussock (Porter's Pass 54%, Craigieburn 27%) and silver tussock (Porter's Pass 53%, Craigieburn 34%). Highest tussock seedling emergence occurred in controls, with a trend towards lower emergence the higher the cover crop density.
However, tussock seedling survival over the first 18 months was positively related to the amount of cover present e.g. in 1969 at Craigieburn average percent survival (and % cover): control: 98% (54%); clover: 77% (41%); fescue 89 (54%): bent: 96 (85%); Yorkshire fog: 89% (59%).

Growth of tussock seedlings was slow. Tiller number (range 2.7-13.5 in 1968) tended to be greatest in plots with least cover species. This is attributed to less competition for nutrients leading to greater tillering (and larger tussocks), but countered by lower survival in the controls. Most tussocks decreased in size during the second growing season. The results of the trials were considered disappointing; low seedling numbers were caused in part by bad weather (especially at Craigieburn where snow and a rapid thaw caused severe surface wash and erosion).
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust