Restoration of the Clanwilliam cedar Widdringtonia cedarbergensis: the importance of monitoring seedlings planted in the Cederberg, South Africa

  • Published source details Mustart P., Juritz J., Makua C., van der Merwe S.W. & Wessels N. (1995) Restoration of the Clanwilliam cedar Widdringtonia cedarbergensis: the importance of monitoring seedlings planted in the Cederberg, South Africa. Biological Conservation, 72, 73-76.


A decline of Clanwilliam cedar Widdringtonia cedarbergensis (an endemic conifer of the fynbos of the Cederberg mountains) led to a restoration programme to bolster the wild population. Adult trees are easily killed by higher intensity fire and a lack of sufficient seed-bearing trees after a wildfire in December 1989/January 1990 has resulted in low seedling recruitment. This project investigated the effects of several microhabitat factors on the survival of transplanted seedlings.

Short-frequency (every 4-6 years), low-intensity patch-burning in autumn/winter (to reduce fuel loads in order to prevent high intensity fires) was combined with large-scale planting of nursery-reared seedling in newly burnt areas. In November 1992, seedling survival at two seedling plantation sites (about 1 km apart), each burnt just before seedlings were transplanted, was recorded:
Site 1 - several thousand 1-year old seedlings transplanted in May 1991; survival (alive/dead) recorded for 69 randomly chosen seedlings (i.e. 18 months after planting);
Site 2 - fifty, 3 year-old seedlings planted in May 1987.
Four microhabitat factors associated with each seedling were recorded: shade, aspect, competition from other plants and soil depth.

Seedling survival was considered high at both sites: site 1, 39.1% and 2, 61.2%.  At site 2 seedlings were on average over twice the height (19.4 cm) of those at site 1 (7.8 cm), and had about 21 times the canopy volume (1,021.3 cm³ compared with 48.7 cm³).
No microhabitat variable measured had a significant effect on height or canopy volume at either site. Shade was the only variable showing significant effects on seedling survival at site 1. Increased shade led to greater survival probability: no shade 0% (0/7); partial shade 42% (25/59); complete shade 75% (3/4).
Transplanting of seedling was more efficient (greater seedling survival) than (earlier reported) seed sowing. Ongoing monitoring is needed to assess longer-term survival.
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 20

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust