Study

Snaring to control feral pigs Sus scrofa in rain forest in Kipahulu National Park, Maui, Hawaiian Islands, USA

  • Published source details Anderson S.J. & Stone C.P. (1993) Snaring to control feral pigs Sus scrofa in a remote Hawaiian rain forest. Biological Conservation, 63, 195-201

Summary

Kipahulu Valley within Haleakala National Park (Maui Island) contains some of the most intact remaining rainforest in Hawaii. Amongst other things, it supports over 400 native plant species (45% endemic to the islands). Feral pigs Sus scrofa probably began to invade this area in the late 1970s. Due to habitat damage being caused, it was decided to attempt pig eradication by snaring within two purpose-built large fenced areas within the Valley.

To develop a control strategy, pig home ranges and movement patterns were assessed by radio-telemetry studies during November 1979-March 1980 (13 adults captured in box traps, fitted with radio collars, and released) and April 1985.
 
The Valley was divided into two fenced management units (120 cm hog wire mesh with a strand of barbed wire at ground level, anchored to fence posts). Fencing above the Valley headwall (2,380 m) was completed in June 1986, preventing pig ingress into upper areas.
 
Two fences were constructed along contours at 960 m (completed September 1986) and 1,400 m (completed March 1987), with adjoining side fencing, utilizing natural barriers (e.g. steep sidewalls and deep ravines) to complete the pig-proof units. These created the two management units, the lower containing 6.2 km² of habitat (bounded by the 960 and 1,400 m elevation fences); the upper 7.8 km².
 
During the 45 months, 1,978 snares were set (equivalent to 1.6 million snare nights). Scouting and pig activity transects were used to assess eradication success.

Initial pig densities were estimated at 6/km2 in the upper unit and 14.3/km2 in the lower (based on population reconstruction from individuals killed and aged). An average effort of 43 worker hours/pig was used to remove 53 pigs from the upper unit (21 (40%) boars, 23 (43%) sows, and nine (17%) too young to determine sex), and 7 hours/pig to remove 175 pigs (38 (22%) boars, 76 (43%) sows and 61 (35%) undetermined sex) from lower unit.
 
Snare density was 96/km² in the upper unit and 200/km2 in the lower unit, at the end of the study. Near eradication in the upper unit was achieved over 45 months; during the first three months, nearly 60% (31) of the pigs present or born during the study were removed. In the lower unit whilst only 10% (17) were removed initially, eradication after 45 months was still nearly achieved.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: http://www.sciencedirect.com

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust