Impact of different cutting regimes on the performance of Brachypodium pinnatum in Dutch chalk grassland

  • Published source details Bobbink R. & Willems J.H. (1991) Impact of different cutting regimes on the performance of Brachypodium pinnatum in Dutch chalk grassland. Biological Conservation, 56, 1-21.


Over the past 10 years, some Dutch chalk grasslands have experienced pronounced increases in tor grass (wood-brome) Brachypodium pinnatum dominance and drastic decreases in plant species diversity. This is despite continuance of the usual management of hay making in autumn, under which herb-rich sward was previously maintained. Experimental cutting regimes were initiated in an attempt to reduce Brachypodium dominance.

In two chalk grasslands, the impact of cutting and removal of the cut vegetation in mid-summer (as opposed to the traditional autumn cut) was investigated in 2- and 5-year experiments. Biomass of Brachypodium and forbs were recorded in sample plots. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) in above- and below-ground Brachypodium plant material was analysed.

Cutting in mid-summer reduced Brachypodium dominance within three years, and Brachypodium biomass decreased from 80% to less than 35% over five years of summer cutting. In contrast, forb biomass doubled. Summer cutting effectively prevented Brachypodium from ‘overtopping’ other species, thus light penetrated more deeply. Many characteristic chalk grassland species, especially short-lived forbs and smaller species benefited, and species diversity markedly increased.
N and P in above- or below-ground Brachypodium did not demonstrate nutrient deficiencies due to summer cutting. There was no correlation found between N removal by cutting and the reduction of Brachypodium dominance. It is suggested that a decrease in carbohydrates in Brachypodium rhizomes is an important factor in its reduction.
It is concluded that at these sites, mid-summer cutting/removal reduced Brachypodium dominance and restored forb-rich chalk grassland vegetation within five years.
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 19

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust