Study

Control of feral cats Felis catus on sub-Antarctic Marion Island, South Africa

  • Published source details Bloomer J.P. & Bester M.N. (1992) Control of feral cats on sub-Antarctic Marion Island, Indian Ocean. Biological Conservation, 60, 211-219

Summary

In 1949, five domestic cats Felis catus were introduced to sub-Antarctic Marion Island (29, 000 ha; 46°54'S, 37°45'E; South Africa) as pets. By 1977 their number had grown to a round 3,400. They had caused extensive damage to nesting seabird populations; the extirpation by 1965 of the common diving petrel Pelecanoides urinatrix is attributed to cat predation. This paper summarises initial biocontrol efforts and the first four years of an intensive eradication programme from August 1986 to April 1990.  

In 1977, as the cat population density was high, biological control via introduction of the viral disease, feline panleucopaenia, was considered the most efficient and cost effective method to employ. After its introduction, cat numbers decreased from an estimated 3,405 in 1977 to 615 (±107) in 1982 but evidence suggested that the disease was becoming less effective as the rate of decline was slowing. However, at these reduced densities hunting was considered perhaps a feasible method of removal.

A full-scale hunting effort was initiated in the austral spring of 1986. Trapping was also incorporated in the winter of 1989 and the following year when it became apparent that hunting alone was not removing sufficient animals to maintain the population decline.

From August 1986 to April 1990, 872 cats were shot and 80 trapped over 14,725 hours of hunting. Night hunting (by spotlight) proved far more efficient than day hunting, as the cats were found to be largely nocturnal.
 
As the programme progressed, cats seen during night hunting and kills per hour greatly decreased as cat numbers declined. Hunting success (cats killed as a proportion of those seen) also decreased. Thus whilst the programme succeeded in greatly reducing the cat population, removal of the last individuals became increasingly difficult. Attempted eradication is ongoing.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: http://www.sciencedirect.com

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust