Study

Hatch success of translocated leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea eggs moved to stable beach areas, Sandy Point National Wildlife Refuge, St Croix, US Virgin Islands

  • Published source details Eckert K.L. & Eckert S.A. (1990) Embryo mortality and hatch success in in situ and translocated leatherback sea turtle Dermochelys coriacea eggs. Biological Conservation, 53, 37-46

Summary

Worldwide, sea turtle populations are declining. Conservation measures to bolster numbers are thus desirable. At Sandy Point National Wildlife Refuge, St Croix, US Virgin Islands, natural beach erosion was estimated to cause the loss of 45–60% of leatherback turtle Dermochelys coriacea eggs laid each year. In order to try and improve hatch success, excavating nests in vulnerable areas and reburying in stable beach zones was undertaken. Hatch success was compared to nests left in situ.

 

Over the 4 study years (1982–1985), 31.4% to 68.1% of the eggs laid annually (312 of 582 total clutches) in beach zones vulnerable to erosion were collected when the female was laying. These clutches were carefully reburied in stable beach zones in an effort to mitigate losses to erosion.

The proportion of eggs per clutch that failed to develop, the proportion that contained pre-term dead embryos, the occurrence of embryonic deformity, or the risk of egg or hatchling predation did not significantly increase in reburied nests compared to those left in situ. However, there was a consistently larger proportion of pipped, dead hatchlings in clutches that had been reburied reducing overall hatch success (53.7% hatching) compared to in situ clutches (64.1%). Importantly, the translocation and reburial of otherwise doomed clutches resulted in a net gain of around 6,650 hatchlings over the 4 years.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: http://www.sciencedirect.com

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust