Returns of pond-reared juvenile green turtles tagged and released in Torres strait, Northern Australia

  • Published source details Kowarsky J. & Capelle M. (1979) Returns of pond-reared juvenile green turtles tagged and released in Torres strait, Northern Australia. Biological Conservation, 15, 207-214.


To give an insight into the potential of 'head-starting' as a marine turtle conservation measure, an analysis of the return information associated with the release in the Torres Strait (northern Queensland) in 1974 of 1,082 green Chelonia mydas and 53 hawksbill Eretmochelys imbricata turtles captive-reared from egg or hatchling for 1-2 years, was undertaken.

Turtles were captive-reared from eggs or newly emerged hatchling derived from local wild sources. The age of juvenile turtles at release was around 1-2 years old. A 'Hasco' cattle ear tag (with individual identification code and return address for tags) was attached to the trailing edge of a foreflipper of each turtle. Turtles were released in batches from beaches on Yorke Island (9°45' S, 143°24'E), Murray Island and Darnley Island (9°35'S, 143°46'E) on several dates in 1974.

Twelve green and two hawksbill turtles were subsequently ‘recaptured’ (e.g. by fishermen who returned tags) from 12 to 400 days after release; these individuals had swum minimum distances ranging from 70 to 570 km from their release point. Most turtles (11 of the 12 recaptured green turtles) were recaptured within one year of release. As well as mortality over time, other factors such as emigration from the area and tag shedding may have influenced tag returns. Information of tag shedding rates in green turtles over long periods is very limited but an estimated tag loss rate of 15-20% from another study, suggests that shedding rates of the tag-type applied may be high.
‘Batch 5’ green turtles had a higher rate of recapture (10 of the 12 tag returns) than other batches of green turtles. Reasons for this are unclear and could be viewed as both a positive or negative outcome. The average size of Batch 5 turtles was about 10 cm longer than others and they were released latest in the year. Their larger size may have made them more susceptible to capture (hence higher return rate); equally survivorship of these larger turtles may have been better, hence the higher recapture rate. Other factors such as seasonal variation in fishing effort, sea conditions, or Batch 5 turtles perhaps being in better condition than the others, need also to be considered.
The results at least provide some evidence that captive-reared turtles are able to survive for some time and move considerable distances after release into the sea.
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust