Study

Recovery of alpine tundra under protection after damage by human activities in the rocky mountains of Colorado

  • Published source details Willard B.E. & Marr J.W. (1971) Recovery of alpine tundra under protection after damage by human activities in the rocky mountains of Colorado. Biological Conservation, 3, 181-190.

Summary

A summer highway, Trail Ridge Road in the Rocky Mountain National Park, traverses more than 19 km of alpine tundra, rising to over 3,658 m. The Ridge has been accessible by vehicle for over 50 years and millions of people have visited. Visitor activities are concentrated around parking areas but many hikers walk out along established paths. Excessive trampling destroys the fragile tundra plants and initiates soil erosion. The present study was undertaken to investigate processes and rates of vegetation recovery when protected from further trampling.

Two areas each 100 sq ft (9.24 sq m) suffering trampling damage were protected in spring 1959(subsequentlyenlarged to about twice the size):
 
Forest Canyon Overlook - An exclosure was erected across the most prominent trail produced by one season of trampling (in 1958).
 
Rock Cut -An exclosure was installed alongside the prominent trail; the area had been subject to trampling over 26 years, there was a mosaic of bare ground and vegetation patches in various stages of degradation.
 
In 1960, a third exclosure was added at Fall River Pass in an area by a car park subject to trampling over 38 years. Most vegetation had been lost with just remnants persisting around boulders; most of the area was bare gravel. The exclosure was demarcated by rocks, which greatly reduced rather than eliminated access.
 
Observations were made every week during spring-autumn (when snow-free) from1959 through 1962. Plants were mapped and photographs taken to record vegetation changes; cover, growth and seedling emergence were monitored.

Forest Canyon - During the first season of protection, all flowering plants (except cushion-plants) exhibited almost normal growth, but total cover was slightly less than undamaged areas; six species of lichens eliminated by trampling remained absent. By the second season the protected area appeared almost natural, except that lichens were still absent and eroded and dead centres of cushion-plants persisted. During 1961 and 1962, a few fragments of soil lichens, the pioneering moss Bryum argenteum, and the grass Poa fendleriana appeared. By the end of the1962 season almost complete vegetation recovery was achieved.
 
Rock Cut -In the exclosure there was an increase in vegetative growth, but after 4-years the potentially dominant species, bog sedge Kobresia myosuroides, still exhibited reduced vigour and some other important species were absent.
 
Fall River showed no improvement in the three seasons of observation. The only change noted was that under the reduced trampling, the compacted soil was loosened by needle-ice activity.
 
This study suggests that badly damaged areas will require many years to recover and that secondary succession back to the climax Kobresia stand appears incredibly slow.
 
 
Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at: http://www.science-direct.com/science  

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust