Study

An alternative rotational stocking management designed to favour butterflies in permanent grasslands

  • Published source details Farruggia A., Dumont B., Scohier A., Leroy T., Pradel P. & Garel J. (2012) An alternative rotational stocking management designed to favour butterflies in permanent grasslands. Grass and Forage Science, 67, 136-149.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Use rotational grazing

Action Link
Butterfly and Moth Conservation
  1. Use rotational grazing

    A replicated, randomized, controlled study in 2005–2008 in six pastures in Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France (Farruggia et al, 2012) found that, at high, but not low, stocking density, pastures cattle-grazed in rotation with one area left ungrazed for two months had higher butterfly species richness and abundance than constantly stocked areas. At high cattle stocking density, rotational pastures had higher butterfly species richness (7) and abundance (22) than constantly stocked pastures (richness: 4; abundance: 8), but at low stocking density there was no difference between rotational (richness: 6; abundance: 17) or constant pastures (richness: 5; abundance: 13). Within rotationally grazed pastures, at both high and low stocking the ungrazed sub-plot had higher butterfly species richness (4–5) and abundance (10–13) than three grazed sub-plots (richness: 2–4; abundance: 3–5). Within an 80-ha mountain pasture, two grazing treatments (each replicated three times) were compared: cows grazing on rotation around four sub-plots, with one plot being left ungrazed early June–early August, and constant grazing across the whole plot. Plots were grazed at a high stocking rate (1.6 livestock units/ha) from late May–late September 2005–2006 and at a low rate (1.2 livestock units/ha) from late May–mid- or late October 2007–2008. Butterflies and burnet moths were counted twice annually along 50-m walking transects in July and/or August. There was one transect/rotational sub-plot and three transects overall/constant grazing plot.

    (Summarised by: Eleanor Bladon)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust