Study

A highway intersection as an alternative habitat for a meadow butterfly: effect of mowing, habitat geometry and roads on the ringlet (Aphantopus hyperantus)

  • Published source details Valtonen A. & Saarinen K. (2005) A highway intersection as an alternative habitat for a meadow butterfly: effect of mowing, habitat geometry and roads on the ringlet (Aphantopus hyperantus). Annales Zoologici Fennici, 545-556.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Alter mowing regimes on greenspaces and road verges

Action Link
Butterfly and Moth Conservation
  1. Alter mowing regimes on greenspaces and road verges

    A study in 2003 along a highway in South Karelia, Finland (Valtonen and Saarinen 2005) found that roadsides mown in had more ringlet butterflies Aphantopus hyperantus than those mown in mid-summer. There were more ringlets along road verges that were mown in late summer (estimated population size = 840–2720; population density = 1160–4360 individuals/ha) than those mown in mid-summer (estimated population size: 220–1500 individuals; population density: 500–1200 individuals/ha). A lower percentage of butterflies first caught along verges mown in late summer (11–31%) moved out of their original patch than those caught along verges mown in mid-summer (43–63%) (these data were not tested for statistical significance). On 30 days between June and August 2003, butterflies were sampled using mark-release-recapture surveys along a 2.2-km long transect along a highway intersection and adjacent roads. The site was divided into 80–280-m sections based on habitat: an intersection between two roads with either late summer mowing and hay removal or with mid-summer (June) mowing without hay removal, and a highway verge with either partial July and full late summer mowing without hay removal (counted as late summer mowing in the study) or with mid-summer (July) mowing without hay removal. The effect of hay removal was not tested.

    (Summarised by: Eleanor Bladon)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust