The nature value of the ditch vegetation in peat areas in relation to farm management

  • Published source details Twisk W., Noordervliet M.A.W. & ter Keurs W.J. (2003) The nature value of the ditch vegetation in peat areas in relation to farm management. Aquatic Ecology, 37, 191-209.


In Holland, farmers could contribute to enhancing plant species diversity of water-filled ditches on agricultural land by undertaking more sympathetic management. However, knowledge as to what measures farmers can realistically undertake and methods of best practice are poorly known. Therefore, a study was set up in peat areas of the Netherlands to assess how dredging, ditch cleaning, and nutrient supply in the adjacent fields, affects ditch vegetation and thus make management recommendations for enhancing floristic value.

Study areas: The study was carried out between 1994 and 1996 in Utrecht, Noord Holland and Zuid Holland Provinces. A total of 240 ditches on 84 dairy farms were selected. The fields (improved grassland) were 30-60 m wide, separated by ditches 2-10 m wide, and 10-200 cm deep with water depths of 10-90 cm.

The following were recorded:

Physical conditions - soil type (mesotrophic or eutrophic peat), ditch width, ditch depth, ditch water table, hydrological isolation and Cl- concentration.

Ditch management -

Cleaning machine (ditch-scoop, mowing-basket, mowing-drum);

Cleaning period (July-September, September-October);

Dredging machine (pull-shovel, punched pull-shovel, suction pipe);

Dredging period (April-August, September-October, November-March);

Years since dredging (ñ1 year, ± 2 years, ± 3 years, >4 years);

Water depth.

Field management - i.e. field nitrogen (N) and phosperous (P) inputs.

Vegetation monitoring: Vegetation was sampled (giving a frequency score to each species present and calculating a 'nature-value' index) along a 150 m ditch section in 25 evenly distributed sections 2 m long x 1.5 m wide, from mid-May to the end of June (i.e., prior to farmers cleaning the ditches).

Increasing the water depth (by raising the ditch water table) is probably the most cost-effective short-term measure to enhance floristic value in the ditches; the 'nature-value index' of submersed and floating species, and the number of emergent species, increased with water depth. Analysis also indicated that reducing the N supply would also yield beneficial results (effect of P supply was not clear) as the number of species declined as N supply increased. Further floristic improvements could be achieved by choosing certain machines or specific management periods.

A significant effect of ditch cleaning was recorded for emergents: using a mowing-drum resulted in lower species numbers (19) and a lower nature-value index (43.3) than for the mowing-basket or ditch-scoop (21.0 and 46.4). Cleaning in September or October also resulted in a lower index for the emergents (44.3), compared with cleaning between July and mid-September (46.4).

The type of dredging machine had an effect on the nature-value index of the submersed and floating vegetation, index values were: pull-shovel (46.1), punched pull-shovel (44.6) and suction pipe (43.9). For emergents, there was a trend for the highest nature-value index (45.1) in recently dredged ditches (1-3 years ago) in September or October. Dredging by suction pipe between November and March resulted in the lowest nature-value index (36.4); all other combinations had intermediate values (42.4).

Effects of ditch management must take into account impacts on fauna, as well as flora.

Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 20

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered speciesVincet Wildlife Trust