Study

Lepidoptera Papilionoidea communities as a sentinel of biodiversity threat: The case of wild boar rooting in a Mediterranean habitat

  • Published source details Scandurra A., Magliozzi L., Fulgione D., Aria M. & D'Aniello B. (2016) Lepidoptera Papilionoidea communities as a sentinel of biodiversity threat: The case of wild boar rooting in a Mediterranean habitat. Journal of Insect Conservation, 20, 353-362.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Reintroduce mammals as ecosystem engineers

Action Link
Butterfly and Moth Conservation
  1. Reintroduce mammals as ecosystem engineers

    A replicated, site comparison study in 2011–2012 in 10 olive groves in Campania, Italy (Scandurra et al. 2016) found that groves with wild boar Sus scrofa present had a lower abundance, species richness and diversity of butterflies than groves where boar were absent. The abundance, species richness and diversity of butterflies in olive groves with wild boar were lower than in groves without boar (data not presented). Habitat specialist species were 83% less abundant in groves with wild boar than groves without boar, whereas habitat generalist species were 27% less abundant where boar were present. Although two species (clouded yellow Colias croceus and common blue Polyommatus icarus) were more abundant in groves with boar than groves without boar, six species (brown argus Aricia agestis, tree grayling Hipparchia statilinus, wall Lasiommata megera, Italian marbled white Melanargia arge, southern gatekeeper Pyronia cecilia and Lulworth skipper Thymelicus acteon) were less abundant in groves with boar (see paper for full species results). Five olive groves with signs of heavy wild boar disturbance, and five groves with no signs of wild boar, were selected. From April–September 2011–2012, butterflies were surveyed 2–3 times/month on one 200-m transect in each grove. Butterflies were classified as “habitat specialists” or “habitat generalists” according to their habitat preferences.

    (Summarised by: Andrew Bladon)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust