Study

Effect of entrance size on nest box selection by common goldeneye Bucephala clangula and hooded mergansers Mergus cucullatus at Long Lake and Mattagami and Muskego Rivers, Ontario, Canada

  • Published source details Lumsden H., Page R. & Gauthier M. (1980) Choice of nest boxes by common goldeneyes in Ontario. Wilson Bulletin, 92, 497-505

Summary

The use of nest boxes in an attempt to increase duck stocks has been practiced during the last decades in Europe and North America. However, few data exist in North America on the characteristics of boxes and natural cavities that appear attractive to common goldeneyes Bucephala clangula for nesting. A selection of experiments in which goldeneyes were presented with boxes with a variety of features was undertaken. The experiment summarised here compared the response of goldeneyes, and also hooded mergansers Mergus cucullatus, to three different entrance sizes of nest boxes.

Study area: The experiment was conducted during two breeding season (1974 and 1996) and was carried out on Long Lake (including Robillard, Kinogami and Kushog Lakes) near Charlton (47º48'N, 79º59'W), and the Mattagami and Muskego Rivers (49º17'N, 81º38'W), northern Ontario, Canada.

Nest box design: Boxes (21 cm x 24 cm base x 45 cm high) were made of 1.27 cm sheeting grade plywood and mounted in sets of three (the centre one aligned with the tree trunk) on horizontal supports nailed about 3 m from the ground to trees alongside the lake or river bank. The bottom of the entrance hole was 33 cm above the box base.

Entrance hole size: Choice by goldeneye and hooded merganser among sets of three boxes with large (13 cm wide × 10 cm high), medium (10.5 × 8 cm) or small (7.5 × 6 cm) oval entrance holes and dark (black painted) interiors (spaced 0.6-1.2 km apart), was compared. In the two study years, use by these ducks of 103 and 105 sets of boxes on Long Lake and 64 and 46 sets of boxes on the Mattagami and Muskego Rivers were recorded. The smaller hooded merganser nests in this area as well as the goldeneye and may compete for nesting cavities; the smallest entrances were large enough to admit hooded mergansers, but too small for goldeneyes.

Box use: It was considered that a box was used if a duck laid one or more eggs in it. The boxes were visited at intervals averaging about 4 days (1-10 days), beginning in late April or early May until June.

Both species of ducks showed a strong preference for large entrance holes. Goldeneyes used boxes with large holes in 32 cases, medium in three and were unable to squeeze through the small entrances. Hooded mergansers chose the large in nine cases and the medium in four, the boxes with a small entrance hole were never used.

The results suggested that that goldeneyes and hooded mergansers do not divide the cavity breeding sites in the study area on the basis of the size of the entrance hole.


Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, which can be viewed at:

http://www.jstor.org/stable/info/4161397?seq=1

 

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 17

Go to the CE Journal

Subscribe to our newsletter

Please add your details if you are interested in receiving updates from the Conservation Evidence team about new papers, synopses and opportunities.

Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust