Study

Influence of woody invader control methods and seed availability on native and invasive species establishment in a Hawaiian forest

  • Published source details Loh R.K. & Daehler C.C. (2008) Influence of woody invader control methods and seed availability on native and invasive species establishment in a Hawaiian forest. Biological Invasions, 10, 805-819.

Summary

The invasive fire tree Morella faya, occurs in large, nearly monospecific stands in moist forests on Hawai'i island. Logging, girdling (i.e. stripping a ring of bark around the trunk) and incremental girdling to kill fire tree stands at different rates were trialled. The aim was to deduce which method best promotes native forest re-establishment. It was considered that logging (i.e. rapid canopy opening) would lead to preferential establishment of fast-growing non-natives, but that slower canopy opening by girdling techniques might enhance native plants able to growing in partial shade.

Study area: The study was undertaken in a 270 ha forest block (fenced to exclude feral pigs Sus scrofa) located in Hawai'i Volcanoes National Park (19˚20'N, 155˚15'E). Here, M.faya has replaced much of the native forest formerly dominated by Metrosideros polymorpha.

Fire tree treatments: In summer 1999, five replicate 30 x 30 m M.faya-dominated plots were randomly assigned to one of three treatments or an untreated control, in each of two sites. The treatments (selected to kill M.faya trees at different rates) were:

i) logging - clear-cutting followed by stump application of 50% Garlon 3A (Dow AgroSciences LLC);

ii) girdling - bark girdling of all M.faya trees, herbicide applied to the girdle;

iii) incremental girdling - girdling and herbicide application to 33% of M.faya trees, girdling of another 33% of trees at 12 months, and of the final 33% after 20 months.


Dead trees, cut and fallen wood were left in situ. Any treated trees resprouting were treated with herbicide a second time within 1 month.

Environmental variables: Soils were analyzed for pH, organic C, P, K, Ca, B, Mg and total N content, before treatment and at the end of the third year. Soil moisture, humidity, air temperature 5 cm above the soil surface, and light availability were measured at intervals throughout the study period.

Plant monitoring: After applying the treatments, seed banks, seed rain and plant recruitment were monitored over 3 years.

Logged plots: The logged plots exhibited invasion by non-native species, as predicted. These plots were characterized by high light intensity, an initial increase in available nitrogen, and wide temperature fluctuations, all of which may have promoted germination and establishment of fast-growing herbs present in the soil seed bank and derived from seed rain.

Girdled plots: Native species, including importantly the dominant native tree M.polymorpha and tree fern Cibotium glaucum, established most frequently in the girdle and incremental girdle plots, but short-lived non-natives were more abundant than native species.

Whilst girdling and incremental girdling both promoted establishment of major components of native forest, the authors consider that a diverse native forest is unlikely to regenerate under these treatments alone due to seed limitation for many native species.


Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

http://www.springerlink.com/content/9073426781561655/fulltext.pdf

 

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust