Study

Small 'no-take' marine reserves enhances biodiversity within Moreton Bay Marine Park, Queensland, Australia

  • Published source details Pillans S., Pillans R.D. & Possingham H.P. (2007) The impact of marine reserves on nekton diversity and community composition in subtropical eastern Australia. Biological Conservation, 136, 455-469

Summary

Moreton Bay, located along the southeast coast of Queensland (Australia), is a coastal area heavily impacted by anthropogenic pressure, including commercial fishing. The objective of this study was to assess if the 'no-take' marine reserves in Moreton Bay were effective in protecting marine biodiversity. The effectiveness of two small coastal marine reserves in the bay were assessed by comparing the diversity and community composition of nekton (i.e. fish and invertebrates) with nearby non-reserve 'fished' areas.

Study sites: The study was undertaken in the Moreton Bay Marine Park (27º25′S, 153º20′E) a subtropical bay covering an area of approximately 3,400 km². Marine reserves were established within the bay in 1997 and are designated no-take areas but amount to less than 1% of the area of the Marine Park. Two reserves were surveyed, Tripcony Bight (5.7 km²) and Willes Island (1.9 km²). These two reserves and four non-reserves (sampled for comparison) were located in different locations within the bay (north and south). Non-reserve comprised two situated on the reserve boundaries, and two further away; the northern pair was subject to recreational fishing and the south pair subject to commercial net fishing or recreational fishing.

Sampling: Sites were surveyed with multiple hauls of a seine net. Netting was carried out in each area during the summers and winters of 2002 and 2003. Species richness, evenness*, density and mean size of the inshore communities were compared between the reserves and non-reserves.


Note: *Species evenesss is the relationship between the relative abundance of the different species, defined as how evenly the total number of individuals of a community are divided between the different species.

During the surveys 168 sampling hauls were made; a total of 65,708 individuals including 90 fish species and 11 invertebrate species, were caught. Whilst species richness was similar between areas, species evenness was significantly lower in the one non-reserve site subject to commercial net fishing. Average nekton size was greater in the no-take reserves (average length 5.4 cm) compared to boundary non-reserves (5.3 cm) and far non-reserves (5.2 cm); density of nekton between sites was similar (c.17.5-20 individuals/haul).

Differences in community composition were apparent, particularly between geographical locations and differently fished sites, results highlighting how commercial fishing can impact on entire nekton assemblages (not just targeted species as non-target species may respond in different ways to fishing disturbance).

The authors conclude that the two small marine no-take reserves in Moreton Bay are enhancing marine biodiversity.


Note: If using or referring to this published study, please read and quote the original paper, this can be viewed at:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00063207

 

Output references

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust