Study

Community- and landscape-level responses of reptiles and small mammals to feral-horse grazing in the Great Basin

  • Published source details Beever E.A. & Brussard P.F. (2004) Community- and landscape-level responses of reptiles and small mammals to feral-horse grazing in the Great Basin. Journal of Arid Environments, 59.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Remove or control invasive or problematic herbivores and seed eaters

Action Link
Reptile Conservation
  1. Remove or control invasive or problematic herbivores and seed eaters

    A site comparison study in 1998 in seven sites of sagebrush steppe in the Great Basin, USA (Beever & Brussard 2004) found that sites where feral horses Equus caballus had been removed had more lizard and snake species but similar abundances compared to grazed sites. Sites where horses had been removed had higher species richness (5 species/site) compared to sites with feral horses (2 species/site), but similar total abundance of individuals (horses removed: 11 individuals/site; horses present: 5 individuals/site). In addition, authors reported that the percentage of expected reptile species (% of those historically present) was similar for sites with and without horse removal. Ten horse-removed and nine horse-occupied plots (135 x 135 m) were chosen that had no recent fires (<15 years); were unused by cattle for at least 20 years; and were dominated by sagebrush (Artemisia tridentala). Only low elevation sites were included in analysis for reptiles (5 horse occupied plots; 6 horse removed plots across 7 sites). Horses were removed 10–14 years prior to the study. Sightings of reptiles within and adjacent to (≤20 m) a trapping grid (established for small mammal trapping) were recorded during May–August 1998.

    (Summarised by: Maggie Watson, William Morgan)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust