Study

Interactions of loggerhead turtle with bottom longline fishery in the Gulf of Gabès, Tunisia

  • Published source details Echwikhi K., Jribi I., Bradai M.N. & Bouain A. (2012) Interactions of loggerhead turtle with bottom longline fishery in the Gulf of Gabès, Tunisia. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 92, 853-858.

Actions

This study is summarised as evidence for the following.

Action Category

Reduce duration of time fishing gear is in the water

Action Link
Reptile Conservation
  1. Reduce duration of time fishing gear is in the water

    A randomized study in 2007–2008 on the sea bottom in the Gulf of Gabès, Tunisia (Echwikhi et al. 2012) found that reducing the time longlines were in the water did not reduce the rate of unwanted catch of loggerhead turtles Caretta caretta in a bottom longline fishery, but did reduce the mortality rate of turtles caught. A similar number of turtles were caught when lines were retrieved immediately (immediate retrieval: 0.18 turtles/1,000 hooks) or left in the water for longer periods (1–2 hour soak: 0.34 turtles/1,000 hooks; >2 hours soak: 0.49 turtles/1,000 hooks; 16 turtles in total). Mortality rates of turtles caught accidentally were lower when bottom longlines were retrieved immediately (0/3 turtles died) compared to when longlines were retrieved after 1–2 hours (2/6 turtles died) or after more than 2 hours (5/7 turtles died). Turtle data was collected by onboard observers in 38 bottom longline deployments during 20 randomly selected fishing trips (1–3 deployments/trip) in July–September 2007–2008. Longline deployments consisted of a 10–12 km longline anchored to the seabed with 1 m long branchlines with hooks (48,020 total hooks deployed). Frozen Sardinella Sardinella aurita or common cuttlefish Sepia officinalis were used as bait. Longline deployments took place at any time of day and lines were retrieved either immediately, after 1–2 hours, or after >2 hours.

    (Summarised by: Katie Sainsbury)

Output references
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 21

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust