Studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, providing background context, the conservation action(s) taken and their consequences.
Review the associated Actions
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
35 Studies found
Refine
Hide
35 Studies found
Download Studies
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Study | Published | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|
Experimental testing of acoustic alarms (pingers) to reduce bycatch of harbour porpoise, Phocoena phocoena, in the state of Washington Based on: Gearin P.J., Goso M.E., Laake J.L., Cooke L. & DeloNo R.L. (2000). Study Link |
2000 | 1 | |
Reduction of harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch by iron-oxide gillnets Based on: Larsen F., Eigaard O.R. & Tougaard J. (2007). Study Link |
2007 | 1 | |
Re-established stony reef attracts harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena Based on: Mikkelsen L., Mouritsen K.N., Dahl K., Teilmann J. & Tougaard J. (2013). Study Link |
2013 | 2 | |
Target-specific acoustic predator deterrence in the marine environment Based on: Götz T. & Janik V.M. (2015). Study Link |
2015 | 1 | |
The rescue, rehabilitation, and release of a stranded finless porpoise (Neophocaena phocaenoides sunameri) at Bohai Bay of China Based on: Yu J., Sun Y. & Xia Z. (2009). Study Link |
2009 | 1 | |
Determining optimal pinger spacing for harbour porpoise bycatch mitigation Based on: Larsen F., Krog C. & Eigaard O.R. (2013). Study Link |
2013 | 1 | |
Acoustic alarms reduce porpoise mortality Based on: Kraus S.D., Read A.J., Solow A., Baldwin K., Spradlin T., Anderson E. & Williamson J. (1997). Study Link |
1997 | 1 | |
An investigation of acoustic deterrent devices to reduce cetacean bycatch in an inshore set net fishery Based on: Hardy T., Williams R., Caslake R. & Tregenza N. (2012). Study Link |
2012 | 1 | |
Twenty-five years of rehabilitation of odontocetes stranded in central and northern California, 1977 to 2002 Based on: Zagzebski K.A., Gulland F.M.D., Haulena M. & Lander M.E. (2006). Study Link |
2006 | 1 | |
The effect of pingers on harbour porpoise, Phocoena phocoena bycatch and fishing effort in the turbot gill net fishery in the Turkish Black Sea coast Based on: Gönener S. & Bilgin S. (2009). Study Link |
2009 | 1 | |
Using pingers to reduce bycatch of small cetaceans in Peru's small-scale driftnet fishery Based on: Mangel J.C., Alfaro-Shigueto J., Witt M.J., Hodgson D.J. & Godley B.J. (2013). Study Link |
2013 | 1 | |
Disturbance of harbour porpoises during construction of the first seven offshore wind farms in Germany Based on: Brandt M.J., Dragon A.C., Diederichs A., Bellmann M.A., Wahl V., Piper W., Nabe-Nielsen J. & Nehls G. (2018). Study Link |
2018 | 1 | |
Seal scarers as a tool to deter harbour porpoises from offshore construction sites Based on: Brandt M.J., Höschle C., Diederichs A., Betke K., Matuscheck R. & Nehls G. (2013). Study Link |
2013 | 1 | |
Entrapment of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) in herring weirs in the Bay of Fundy, Canada Based on: Neimanis A.S., Koopman H.N., Westgate A.J., Murison L.D. & Read A.J. (2004). Study Link |
2004 | 1 | |
The Banana Pinger Trial: investigation into the Fishtek Banana Pinger to reduce cetacean bycatch in an inshore set net fishery Based on: Crosby A., Tregenza N. & Williams R. (2013) Wildlife Trusts report. Study Link |
2013 | 2 | |
Far-reaching effects of a seal scarer on harbour porpoises, Phocoena phocoena Based on: Brandt M.J., Höschle C., Diederichs A., Betke K., Matuscheck R., Witte S. & Nehls G. (2013). Study Link |
2013 | 1 | |
Effect of pingers on harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) bycatch in the US northeast gillnet fishery Based on: Palka D.L., Rossman M.C., Vanatten A. & Orphanides C.D. (2008). Study Link |
2008 | 1 | |
Spatial and temporal impact of pingers on porpoises Based on: Carlström J., Berggren P. & Tregenza N.J.C. (2009). Study Link |
2009 | 1 | |
Echolocation behavior of harbor porpoises Phocoena phocoena around chemically enhanced gill nets Based on: Cox T.M. & Read A.J. (2004). Study Link |
2004 | 1 | |
Porpoise Alerting Device (PAL): Synthetic harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) communication signals influence behaviour and reduce by-catch Based on: Culik B., Dorrien C. von & Conrad M. (2016) 451, 150-155. Study Link |
2016 | 1 | |
Rehabilitation and homing behavior of a satellite-tracked harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) Based on: Schofield T.D., Early G., Wenzel F.W., Matassa K., Perry C., Beekman G., Whitaker B., Gebhard E., Walton W. & Swingle M. (2008). Study Link |
2008 | 1 | |
Long-term effectiveness of pingers on a small population of finless porpoises in Japan Based on: Amano M., Kusumoto M., Abe M. & Akamatsu T. (2017). Study Link |
2017 | 1 | |
Monitoring a rehabilitated harbor porpoise using satellite telemetry Based on: Westgate A.J., Read A.J., Cox T.M., Schofield T.D., Whitaker B.R. & Anderson K.E. (1998). Study Link |
1998 | 1 | |
Bycatch of vulnerable species: Understanding the process and mitigating the impacts Based on: Northridge S., Kingston A., Mackay A. & Lonergan M. (2011) Sea Mammal Research Unit (SMRU) report, Report to DEFRA (project ref. MF1003). Study Link |
2011 | 1 | |
Reactions of harbor porpoises Phocoena phocoena and herring Clupea harengus to acoustic alarms Based on: Culik B.M., Koschinski S., Tregenza N. & Ellis G.M. (2001). Study Link |
2001 | 1 |
Download Studies
0 selected |
|