Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, providing background context, the conservation action(s) taken and their consequences.
Review the associated Actions
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
0 selected |
|
Study | Published | Actions | |
---|---|---|---|
Survival and growth of larval coastal giant salamanders (Dicamptodon tenebrosus) in streams in the oregon coast range Based on: Sagar J.P., Olson D.H. & Schmitz R.A. (2007). Study Link |
2007 | 1 | |
Rehabilitation of habitat connectivity between two important marsh areas divided by a major road with heavy traffic Based on: Scoccianti C. (2006). Study Link |
2006 | 2 | |
Cutting the carnage: wildlife usage of road culverts in north-eastern New South Wales Based on: Taylor B.D. & Goldingay R.L. (2003). Study Link |
2003 | 3 | |
Roads and wildlife: impacts, mitigation and implications for wildlife management in Australia Based on: Taylor B.D. & Goldingay R.L. (2010). Study Link |
2010 | 6 | |
Use of fauna passages along waterways under highways Based on: Veenbaas G. & Brandjes J. (1999) Proceedings of the International Conference on Wildlife Ecology and Transportation, 253-258. Study Link |
1999 | 2 | |
Road crossing structures for amphibians and reptiles: informing design through behavioral analysis Based on: Woltz H.W., Gibbs J.P. & Ducey P.K. (2008). Study Link |
2008 | 4 | |
Amphibian and reptile tunnels in the Netherlands Based on: Zuiderwijk A. (1989) Amphibians and Roads: Proceedings of the Toad Tunnel Conference, 67-74. Study Link |
1989 | 3 | |
Amphibians in drains project report summary Based on: Muir D. (2012). Study Link |
2012 | 1 | |
Reasons for preventing amphibian mortality on roads Based on: Langton T.E.S. (1989) Amphibians and Roads: Toad Tunnel Conference, 75-80. Study Link |
1989 | 1 |
0 selected |
|
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.
What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.
More about What Works in Conservation
Download free PDF or purchaseAn online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.
Read the latest volume: Volume 21
Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.
We use limited Cookies to run the site and to analyse our traffic (none for site vendors). By using this site, you will be providing your consent to our use of Cookies.
Accept & continueFields with * are required.