Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
294 Actions found
Refine
Hide
294 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Provide supplementary feed to reduce tree damage Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use tree tubes/small fences/cages to protect individual trees Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Plant trees following clearfelling Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Control firewood collection in remnant native forest and woodland Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Provide or retain set-aside areas on farmland Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Harvest timber outside mammal reproduction period Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Allow forest to regenerate naturally following logging Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Coppice trees Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Install barrier fencing along waterways Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Maintain/restore/create habitat connectivity on farmland Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use selective harvesting instead of clearcutting Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 8 |
![]() |
|
Manage hedgerows to benefit wildlife on farmland Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Provide mammals with escape routes from canals Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 5 |
![]() |
|
Plant new or maintain existing hedgerows on farmland Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Use patch retention harvesting instead of clearcutting Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Use conditioned taste aversion to reduce human-wildlife conflict in non-residential sites Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 2 |
![]() |
|
Retain undisturbed patches during thinning operations Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Use non-lethal methods to deter carnivores from attacking humans Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 8 |
![]() |
|
Clear or open patches in forests Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 4 |
![]() |
|
Plant trees on farmland Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Retain dead trees after uprooting Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Pay farmers to cover the costs of conservation measures Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Use thinning of forest instead of clearcutting Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use prescribed burning Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 37 |
![]() |
|
Remove competing vegetation to allow tree establishment in clearcut areas Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|

Terrestrial Mammal Conservation - Published 2020
Terrestrial Mammal Conservation
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.