Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
294 Actions found
Refine
Hide
294 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Use wildlife refuges to reduce hunting impacts Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Use wildlife decoy to reduce vehicle collisions with mammals Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use watchmen to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use voluntary agreements with locals to reduce disturbance Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use visual deterrents (e.g. scarecrows) to deter predation of livestock by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Use vaccination programme Action Link |
Beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Use ultrasonic noises to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use tree tubes/small fences/cages to protect individual trees Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use tree nets to deter wild mammals from fruit crops to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use tranquilizers to reduce stress during translocation Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use traditional breeds of livestock Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use thinning of forest instead of clearcutting Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use taste-aversion to reduce predation of livestock by mammals to deter human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 9 |
![]() |
|
Use target species scent to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use target species distress calls or signals to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 5 |
![]() |
|
Use signs or access restrictions to reduce disturbance to mammals Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use selective trapping methods in hunting activities Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use selective harvesting instead of clearcutting Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 8 |
![]() |
|
Use scent to deter predation of livestock by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Use scarecrows to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use road lighting to reduce vehicle collisions with mammals Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Use reward removal to prevent non-target species from entering traps Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use repellents to reduce cable gnawing Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use repellents that taste bad (‘contact repellents’) to deter crop or property damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 12 |
![]() |
|
Use repellents that smell bad (‘area repellents’) to deter crop or property damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|

Terrestrial Mammal Conservation - Published 2020
Terrestrial Mammal Conservation
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.