Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
294 Actions found
Refine
Hide
294 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Provide or retain set-aside areas on farmland Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Clear or open patches in forests Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 4 |
![]() |
|
Plant trees on farmland Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Plant crops to provide supplementary food for mammals Action Link |
Beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Install mammal crossing points along fences on farmland Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Captive rear in large enclosures prior to release Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Install fences around existing culverts or underpasses under roads/railways Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Restore or create grassland Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Restore or create shrubland Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Provide diversionary feeding for mammals to reduce nuisance behaviour and human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 |
![]() |
|
Treat disease in wild mammals Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 |
![]() |
|
Install wildlife exclusion grates/cattle grids Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Place orphaned or abandoned wild young with wild foster parents Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Fit vehicles with ultrasonic warning devices Action Link |
Unlikely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Set hunting quotas based on target species population trends Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Provide food/salt lick to divert mammals from roads or railways Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Install crossings over/under pipelines Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Plant new or maintain existing hedgerows on farmland Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Use patch retention harvesting instead of clearcutting Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Pay farmers to cover the costs of conservation measures Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Remove competing vegetation to allow tree establishment in clearcut areas Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 |
![]() |
|
Leave coarse woody debris in forests Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 |
![]() |
|
Fell trees in groups, leaving surrounding forest unharvested Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 |
![]() |
|
Apply fertilizer to trees Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 |
![]() |
|
Translocate mammals to reduce overpopulation Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 3 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|

Terrestrial Mammal Conservation - Published 2020
Terrestrial Mammal Conservation
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.