Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
294 Actions found
Refine
Hide
294 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Use negative stimuli to deter consumption of livestock feed by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Play predator calls to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use target species distress calls or signals to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 5 |
![]() |
|
Use bees to deter crop damage by mammals (e.g. elephants) to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Restore former mining sites Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 12 |
![]() |
|
Grow unattractive crop in buffer zone around crops (e.g. chili peppers) to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use chili to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Use fencing to protect water sources for use by wild mammals Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Provide supplementary food after fire Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use fencing to exclude grazers or other problematic species Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Use light/lasers to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Use fencing to exclude predators or other problematic species Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 10 |
![]() |
|
Remove/control non-native amphibians (e.g. cane toads) Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use fire to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 2 |
![]() |
|
Use electric fencing to deter mammals from energy installations or mines Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Remove/control non-native invertebrates Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use repellents to reduce cable gnawing Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use pheromones to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Remove/control non-native mammals Action Link |
Beneficial | 25 |
![]() |
|
Use predator scent to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Use target species scent to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Captive rear in large enclosures prior to release Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Use ‘shock collars’ to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use repellents that taste bad (‘contact repellents’) to deter crop or property damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 12 |
![]() |
|
Use holding pens at release site prior to release of captive-bred mammals Action Link |
Beneficial | 31 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|

Terrestrial Mammal Conservation - Published 2020
Terrestrial Mammal Conservation
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.