Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
130 Actions found
Refine
Hide
130 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Release captive-bred green and golden bell frogs Action Link |
Likely to be ineffective or harmful | 4 | Synopsis Link | |
Release captive-bred Mallorcan midwife toads Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 4 | Synopsis Link | |
Exclude domestic animals or wild hogs by fencing Action Link |
Likely to be ineffective or harmful | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Add lime to water bodies to reduce acidification Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Use antifungal skin bacteria or peptides to reduce chytridiomycosis infection Action Link |
Unlikely to be beneficial | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Use temperature treatment to reduce chytridiomycosis infection Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Use herbicides to control mid-storey or ground vegetation Action Link |
Likely to be ineffective or harmful | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Legal protection of species Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Pay farmers to cover the costs of conservation measures Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Remove or control fish by drying out ponds Action Link |
Beneficial | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Raise awareness amongst the general public through campaigns and public information Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Regulate water levels Action Link |
Beneficial | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Harvest groups of trees instead of clearcutting Action Link |
Likely to be ineffective or harmful | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Use shelterwood harvesting instead of clearcutting Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Translocate natterjack toads Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Create ponds for salamanders (including newts) Action Link |
Beneficial | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Release captive-bred toads Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 5 | Synopsis Link | |
Provide education programmes about amphibians Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 6 | Synopsis Link | |
Use humans to assist migrating amphibians across roads Action Link |
Unlikely to be beneficial | 6 | Synopsis Link | |
Remove or control fish by catching Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 6 | Synopsis Link | |
Captive breeding harlequin toads (Atelopus species) Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 6 | Synopsis Link | |
Translocate salamanders (including newts) Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 6 | Synopsis Link | |
Create ponds for natterjack toads Action Link |
Beneficial | 6 | Synopsis Link | |
Engage volunteers to collect amphibian data (citizen science) Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 | Synopsis Link | |
Create refuges Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 | Synopsis Link |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Amphibian Conservation - Published 2014
Amphibian Synopsis
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.