Providing evidence to improve practice

Actions

Can't find what you're looking for? You can also search Individual Studies.

Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.

1463 actions found

Use organic rather than mineral fertilizers
Beneficial Based on: 19 studies
Use organic rather than mineral fertilizers
Use partial retention harvesting instead of clearcutting
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 3 studies
Use partial retention harvesting instead of clearcutting
Use patch retention harvesting instead of clear-cutting
No evidence found (no assessment) Based on: 0 studies
Use patch retention harvesting instead of clear-cutting
Use patch retention harvesting instead of clearcutting
Likely to be beneficial Based on: 2 studies
Use patch retention harvesting instead of clearcutting
Use patch retention instead of clearcutting
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 1 study
Use patch retention instead of clearcutting
Use perch-deterrents to stop raptors perching on pylons
Likely to be beneficial Based on: 1 study
Use perch-deterrents to stop raptors perching on pylons
Use perches to increase foraging success
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 4 studies
Use perches to increase foraging success
Use pesticides only when pests or crop damage reach threshold levels
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 14 studies
Use pesticides only when pests or crop damage reach threshold levels
Use pioneer plants or crops as nurse plants
No evidence found (no assessment) Based on: 0 studies
Use pioneer plants or crops as nurse plants
Use prescribed burning
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 7 studies
Use prescribed burning
Use prescribed burning on Australian sclerophyll forest
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 3 studies
Use prescribed burning on Australian sclerophyll forest
Use prescribed burning on coastal habitats
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 3 studies
Use prescribed burning on coastal habitats
Use prescribed burning on deciduous forests
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 4 studies
Use prescribed burning on deciduous forests
Use prescribed burning on grasslands
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 21 studies
Use prescribed burning on grasslands
Use prescribed burning on pine forests
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 28 studies
Use prescribed burning on pine forests
Use prescribed burning on savannas
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 5 studies
Use prescribed burning on savannas
Use prescribed burning on shrublands
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 8 studies
Use prescribed burning on shrublands
Use prescribed burning within the context of home range size and use
No evidence found (no assessment) Based on: 0 studies
Use prescribed burning within the context of home range size and use
Use prescribed fire after tree planting
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 4 studies
Use prescribed fire after tree planting
Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in forests
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 18 studies
Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in forests
Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in grassland
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 3 studies
Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in grassland
Use prescribed fire to remove invasive plant species
No evidence found (no assessment) Based on: 0 studies
Use prescribed fire to remove invasive plant species
Use prescribed fire: effect on understory plants
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 37 studies
Use prescribed fire: effect on understory plants
Use prescribed fire: effects on mature trees
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 16 studies
Use prescribed fire: effects on mature trees
Use prescribed fire: effects on young trees
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 17 studies
Use prescribed fire: effects on young trees

Download these search results:

1. From:
2. Format:
3.