Conservation Evidence strives to be as useful to conservationists as possible. Please take our survey to help the team improve our resource.

Providing evidence to improve practice

Actions

Can't find what you're looking for? You can also search Individual Studies.

Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.

1751 actions found

Use shelterwood harvest instead of clearcutting
Likely to be beneficial Based on: 3 studies
Use shelterwood harvest instead of clearcutting
Use shelterwood cutting instead of clearcutting
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 1 study
Use shelterwood cutting instead of clearcutting
Use shelterwood cutting instead of clearcutting
Evidence not assessed Based on: 1 study
Use shelterwood cutting instead of clearcutting
Use shelter wood cutting instead of clear-cutting
No evidence found (no assessment) Based on: 0 studies
Use shelter wood cutting instead of clear-cutting
Use shark liver oil to reduce seabird bycatch
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 2 studies
Use shark liver oil to reduce seabird bycatch
Use shading for planted trees
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 1 study
Use shading for planted trees
Use selective thinning after restoration planting
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 1 study
Use selective thinning after restoration planting
Use selective logging instead of clear-cutting
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 3 studies
Use selective logging instead of clear-cutting
Use selective harvesting/logging instead of clearcutting
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 7 studies
Use selective harvesting/logging instead of clearcutting
Use rotational grazing to restore oak savannas
No evidence found (no assessment) Based on: 0 studies
Use rotational grazing to restore oak savannas
Use ring-barking (girdling), cutting or silvicides to produce snags
Likely to be beneficial Based on: 5 studies
Use ring-barking (girdling), cutting or silvicides to produce snags
Use repellents to deter birds from landing on pools polluted by mining
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 1 study
Use repellents to deter birds from landing on pools polluted by mining
Use repellents on baits for predator control
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 2 studies
Use repellents on baits for predator control
Use raptor models to deter birds and so reduce incidental mortality
Unlikely to be beneficial Based on: 1 study
Use raptor models to deter birds and so reduce incidental mortality
Use puppets to increase the survival or growth of hand-reared chicks
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 3 studies
Use puppets to increase the survival or growth of hand-reared chicks
Use prescribed fire: effects on young trees
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 17 studies
Use prescribed fire: effects on young trees
Use prescribed fire: effects on mature trees
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 16 studies
Use prescribed fire: effects on mature trees
Use prescribed fire: effect on understory plants
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 37 studies
Use prescribed fire: effect on understory plants
Use prescribed fire to remove invasive plant species
No evidence found (no assessment) Based on: 0 studies
Use prescribed fire to remove invasive plant species
Use prescribed fire to maintain or restore disturbance
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 3 studies
Use prescribed fire to maintain or restore disturbance
Use prescribed fire to control problematic plants
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 6 studies
Use prescribed fire to control problematic plants
Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in grassland
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 3 studies
Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in grassland
Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in forests
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 18 studies
Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in forests

Download these search results:

1. From:
2. Format:
3.