Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
2584 Actions found
Refine
Hide
2584 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Use exclusion nets Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use false brood parasite eggs to discourage brood parasitism Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use fences as biological corridors for primates Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use fences or barriers to protect planted vegetation Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use fences to exclude large herbivores Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use fences to exclude livestock from shrublands Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 12 |
![]() |
|
Use fencing to enclose large herbivores (e.g. deer) Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use fencing to exclude grazers or other problematic species Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Use fencing to exclude predators or other problematic species Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 10 |
![]() |
|
Use fencing to protect water sources for use by wild mammals Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use fencing/netting to reduce predation of fish stock by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use fertilizer Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 8 |
![]() |
|
Use fertilizer after tree planting Action Link |
Unlikely to be beneficial | 5 |
![]() |
|
Use fire suppression/control Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 |
![]() |
|
Use fire to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 2 |
![]() |
|
Use flags to reduce predation of livestock by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 5 |
![]() |
|
Use flashing lights to reduce mortality from artificial lights Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use genetically modified alternatives Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 4 |
![]() |
|
Use glazing treatments to reduce light spill from inside lit buildings Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use gloves to handle amphibians Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 4 |
![]() |
|
Use GPS and/or VHF tracking devices on individuals of problem troops to provide farmers with early warning of crop raiding Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use grazing instead of cutting for pasture or grassland management Action Link |
Likely to be ineffective or harmful | 8 |
![]() |
|
Use grazing or alter livestock to control grass Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Use grazing to control problematic plants Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use grazing to control trees Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.