Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
2677 Actions found
Refine
Hide
2677 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reduce inter-specific competition for food by removing or controlling competitor species Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Reduce adverse habitat alterations by excluding problematic terrestrial species Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Set a minimum landing size for commercially fished species Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 4 |
![]() |
|
Remove problematic vegetation Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 4 |
![]() |
|
Manage ditches to benefit wildlife Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Prevent livestock grazing in forests Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 4 |
![]() |
|
Physically protect nests from predators using non-electric fencing Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Thin trees within forests: effects on non-vascular plants Action Link |
Likely to be ineffective or harmful | 4 |
![]() |
|
Designate a Marine Protected Area and introduce some fishing restrictions (types unspecified) Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Cut/remove/thin forest plantations Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Provide training to anti-poaching ranger patrols Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 4 |
![]() |
|
Deter bats from turbines using ultrasound Action Link |
Evidence not assessed | 4 |
![]() |
|
Captive rear in large enclosures prior to release Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Mechanically/manually remove invasive plants Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 4 |
![]() |
|
Install overpasses as road/railway crossing structures for bats Action Link |
Evidence not assessed | 4 |
![]() |
|
Grow non-crop plants that produce chemicals that attract natural enemies Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Rehabilitation of injured and treated birds Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 4 |
![]() |
|
Use selective or reduced impact logging instead of conventional logging Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Reduce pesticide, herbicide or fertiliser use Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Install fences around existing culverts or underpasses under roads/railways Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Provide artificial nesting sites for divers/loons Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Leave uncut rye grass in silage fields for birds Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Add organic matter Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 4 |
![]() |
|
Use grazing to maintain or restore disturbance Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 4 |
![]() |
|
Maintain traditional water meadows Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.