Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
3689 Actions found
Refine
Hide
3689 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Use water-based muds instead of oil-based muds (drilling fluids) in the drilling process Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use watchmen to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use volunteers to deter tourists from harassing marine and freshwater mammals at wildlife-viewing sites Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use volunteers to collect downed birds and rehabilitate them Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use voluntary agreements with locals to reduce disturbance Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use voluntary agreements with local people to reduce disturbance Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use vocalisations to attract birds to safe areas Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 10 |
![]() |
|
Use visual or acoustic deterrents to discourage reptiles from approaching vessels Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use visual deterrents on fishing gear Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 2 |
![]() |
|
Use visual deterrents (e.g. scarecrows) to deter predation of livestock by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Use visual and acoustic ‘scarers’ to deter birds from landing on pools polluted by mining or sewage Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Use vegetation removal together with mechanical disturbance to the soil Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Use variable retention management during forestry operations Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use vaccinations Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 6 |
![]() |
|
Use vaccination programme Action Link |
Beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Use ultraviolet filters on lights Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use ultrasonic noises to deter crop damage by mammals to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use ultrasonic devices to deter cats Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use tree tubes/small fences/cages to protect individual trees Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use tree nets to deter wild mammals from fruit crops to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use tree guards or shelters to protect planted trees Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Use traps instead of fishing nets Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use tranquilizers to reduce stress during translocation Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use traditional breeds of livestock Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 5 |
![]() |
|
Use traditional breeds of livestock Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.