Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
3689 Actions found
Refine
Hide
3689 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Recycle or repurpose fluids used in the drilling process Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use signs or access restrictions to reduce disturbance to mammals Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 1 |
![]() |
|
Treat disease in wild mammals Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 |
![]() |
|
Educate the public to reduce consumer demand for fisheries that threaten mammals Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Physically remove problematic plants: freshwater swamps Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Allow plants to adjust to field conditions before planting Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Install exclusion and escape devices on fishing gear Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 6 |
![]() |
|
Retain or plant trees to act as windbreaks Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 1 |
![]() |
|
Reduce the intensity of farmland meadow management Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 4 |
![]() |
|
Use wildlife refuges to reduce hunting disturbance Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Provide supplementary food for kingfishers to increase reproductive success Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Maintain or restore hedges Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
American bullfrog control: Direct removal of juveniles Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 2 |
![]() |
|
Translocate (capture & release) wild primates from development sites to natural habitat elsewhere Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 6 |
![]() |
|
Cover peatland with something other than mulch (without planting) Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Cease or prohibit aggregate extraction Action Link |
Beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Keep cats indoors or in outside runs to reduce predation of wild mammals Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use vaccination programme Action Link |
Beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Introduce and enforce regulations for marine and freshwater mammal watching tours Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Physically remove problematic plants: brackish/saline swamps Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Add root-associated fungi to plants before planting Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use sinking lines instead of floating lines Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Restore or create new habitats after mining and quarrying Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 4 |
![]() |
|
Reduce grazing intensity on pastures Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 1 |
![]() |
|
Introduce voluntary ‘maximum shoot distances’ Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.