Conservation Evidence strives to be as useful to conservationists as possible. Please take our survey to help the team improve our resource.

Providing evidence to improve practice

Actions

Can't find what you're looking for? You can also search Individual Studies.

Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.

2399 actions found

Use prescribed fire: effects on young trees
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 17 studies
Use prescribed fire: effects on young trees
Use prescribed fire: effects on mature trees
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 16 studies
Use prescribed fire: effects on mature trees
Use prescribed fire: effect on understory plants
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 37 studies
Use prescribed fire: effect on understory plants
Use prescribed fire to remove invasive plant species
No evidence found (no assessment) Based on: 0 studies
Use prescribed fire to remove invasive plant species
Use prescribed fire to maintain or restore disturbance
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 3 studies
Use prescribed fire to maintain or restore disturbance
Use prescribed fire to control problematic plants
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 6 studies
Use prescribed fire to control problematic plants
Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in grassland
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 3 studies
Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in grassland
Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in forests
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 18 studies
Use prescribed fire or modifications to burning regime in forests
Use prescribed fire after tree planting
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 4 studies
Use prescribed fire after tree planting
Use prescribed burning within the context of home range size and use
No evidence found (no assessment) Based on: 0 studies
Use prescribed burning within the context of home range size and use
Use prescribed burning to reduce potential for large wild fires
No evidence found (no assessment) Based on: 0 studies
Use prescribed burning to reduce potential for large wild fires
Use prescribed burning to mimic natural fire cycle
No evidence found (no assessment) Based on: 0 studies
Use prescribed burning to mimic natural fire cycle
Use prescribed burning to control trees
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 2 studies
Use prescribed burning to control trees
Use prescribed burning to control grass
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 2 studies
Use prescribed burning to control grass
Use prescribed burning on shrublands
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 8 studies
Use prescribed burning on shrublands
Use prescribed burning on savannas
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 5 studies
Use prescribed burning on savannas
Use prescribed burning on pine forests
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 28 studies
Use prescribed burning on pine forests
Use prescribed burning on grasslands
Trade-off between benefit and harms Based on: 21 studies
Use prescribed burning on grasslands
Use prescribed burning on deciduous forests
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 4 studies
Use prescribed burning on deciduous forests
Use prescribed burning on coastal habitats
Likely to be ineffective or harmful Based on: 3 studies
Use prescribed burning on coastal habitats
Use prescribed burning on Australian sclerophyll forest
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) Based on: 3 studies
Use prescribed burning on Australian sclerophyll forest
Use prescribed burning
Evidence not assessed Based on: 37 studies
Use prescribed burning
Use prescribed burning
Likely to be beneficial Based on: 12 studies
Use prescribed burning
Use pioneer plants or crops as nurse plants
No evidence found (no assessment) Based on: 0 studies
Use pioneer plants or crops as nurse plants

Download these search results:

1. From:
2. Format:
3.