Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
3689 Actions found
Refine
Hide
3689 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crassula helmsii: Use flame-throwers to control plants Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Use dyes to reduce light levels Action Link |
Unlikely to be beneficial | 1 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Use a combination of control measures Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Surround with wire mesh Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Public education Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Plant other species to suppress growth Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Physical control using manual/mechanical control or dredging Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Dry out waterbodies to control plants Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Decontamination to prevent further spread Action Link |
Beneficial | 1 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Chemical control using herbicides Action Link |
Beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Bury plants Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Biological control using herbivores Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Biological control using fungal-based herbicides Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Crassula helmsii: Alter environmental conditions to control plants Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Cover the ground with straw after tree planting Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Cover the ground with plastic mats after restoration planting Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Cover the ground using techniques other than plastic mats after restoration planting Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Cover peatland with something other than mulch (without planting) Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Cover peatland with something other than mulch (after planting) Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 8 |
![]() |
|
Cover peatland with organic mulch (without planting) Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Cover peatland with organic mulch (after planting) Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 12 |
![]() |
|
Coppice woodland Action Link |
Evidence not assessed | 10 |
![]() |
|
Coppice woodland Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Coppice trees Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 1 |
![]() |
|
Coppice trees Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.