Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
2584 Actions found
Refine
Hide
2584 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cease or prohibit aggregate extraction Action Link |
Beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Use vaccination programme Action Link |
Beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Directly plant peatland mosses Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Use drugs to treat parasites Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Provide supplementary food for hummingbirds to increase adult survival Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 7 |
![]() |
|
Provide/increase anti-poaching patrols Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Translocate gamebirds Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 7 |
![]() |
|
Translocate raptors Action Link |
Beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Translocate woodpeckers Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Translocate parrots Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Parrot’s feather: Use of herbicides - 2,4-D Action Link |
Beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Use selective harvesting/logging instead of clearcutting Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 7 |
![]() |
|
Leave coarse woody debris in forests Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 7 |
![]() |
|
Manually control or remove midstorey and ground-level vegetation (including mowing, chaining, cutting etc) in shrubland Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 7 |
![]() |
|
Replant vegetation Action Link |
Beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Apply herbicide to mid- and understorey vegetation Action Link |
Likely to be ineffective or harmful | 7 |
![]() |
|
Create ponds for great crested newts Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Raise water levels in ditches or grassland Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 7 |
![]() |
|
Create ponds for toads Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Water: Add slurry to the soil Action Link |
Likely to be ineffective or harmful | 7 |
![]() |
|
Carnivores: Provide food on a random temporal schedule Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 7 |
![]() |
|
Exclude ants that protect pests Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Provide buffer strips alongside water courses (rivers and streams) Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 7 |
![]() |
|
Convert to organic farming Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 7 |
![]() |
|
Raise mowing height on grasslands to benefit farmland wildlife Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 7 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.