Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
21 Actions found
Refine
Hide
21 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reduce grazing intensity Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 12 |
![]() |
|
Exclude grazers from semi-natural habitats Action Link |
Trade-off between benefit and harms | 11 |
![]() |
|
Reduce management intensity on permanent grasslands for birds Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Delay haying/mowing Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 5 |
![]() |
|
Leave uncut rye grass in silage fields for birds Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Maintain traditional water meadows Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Plant cereals for whole crop silage Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 3 |
![]() |
|
Maintain species-rich, semi-natural grassland Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 2 |
![]() |
|
Raise mowing height on grasslands to benefit birds Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Protect nests from livestock to reduce trampling Action Link |
Unlikely to be beneficial | 2 |
![]() |
|
Provide short grass for waders Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Maintain upland heath/moor Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Use traditional breeds of livestock Action Link |
Unlikely to be beneficial | 1 |
![]() |
|
Mark fences to reduce bird collision mortality Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 1 |
![]() |
|
Create open patches or strips in permanent grassland Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Maintain lowland heathland Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Maintain rush pastures Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Plant Brassica fodder crops Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Use mixed stocking Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Employ areas of semi-natural habitat for rough grazing Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Maintain wood pasture and parkland Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.