Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
Search for evidence
e.g. "frogs chytrid"
3690 Actions found
Refine
Hide
3690 Actions found
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Replace non-native species of tree/shrub with native species Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 1 |
![]() |
|
Replace or improve habitat for bats around roads/railways Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Replace or improve roosting habitat for bats along utility and service line corridors Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Replace or repair damaged anti-predator nets around aquaculture systems Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Replant alternative host plants or disease resistant individuals to combat losses to disease Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Replant native trees in logged areas Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Replant native vegetation Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 11 |
![]() |
|
Replant vegetation Action Link |
Beneficial | 7 |
![]() |
|
Replant vegetation Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Reprofile/relandscape (before planting) Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Reprofile/relandscape peatland (before planting) Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 4 |
![]() |
|
Reprofile/relandscape peatland (without planting) Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Reprofile/relandscape: brackish/saline swamps Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 5 |
![]() |
|
Reprofile/relandscape: brackish/salt marshes Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 9 |
![]() |
|
Reprofile/relandscape: freshwater marshes Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 13 |
![]() |
|
Reprofile/relandscape: freshwater swamps Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Repurpose obsolete offshore structures to act as artificial reefs Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
![]() |
|
Require developers to complete Environmental Impact Assessments when submitting planning applications Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Require mitigation of impacts to marshes or swamps Action Link |
Likely to be beneficial | 9 |
![]() |
|
Rescue and release stranded or trapped marine and freshwater mammals Action Link |
Beneficial | 11 |
![]() |
|
Reseed logged forest Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 1 |
![]() |
|
Resettle illegal human communities (i.e. in a protected area) to another location Action Link |
Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 |
![]() |
|
Restore and maintain microclimate in modified caves Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Restore and manage abandoned orchards for bats Action Link |
No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
![]() |
|
Restore arable land to permanent grassland Action Link |
Awaiting assessment | 10 |
![]() |
Download Actions
0 selected |
|
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.