Create small adjoining cavities or ‘swimthrough’ habitats (≤100 mm) on intertidal artificial structures
Overall effectiveness category Awaiting assessment
Number of studies: 2
View assessment score
Hide assessment score
How is the evidence assessed?
Background information and definitions
Definition: ‘Small adjoining cavities or ‘swimthrough’ habitats’ are adjoining internal cavities sheltered from, but with access to/from, outside the structure. Dimensions can vary but are ≤100 mm in any direction.
Small adjoining cavities or ‘swimthrough’ habitats are not well-studied in intertidal rocky habitats. They may form through weathering of softer rocks, amongst loosely-consolidated cobbles/boulders, or amongst three-dimensional structures created by living organisms. They likely provide organisms refuge from desiccation, temperature fluctuations and predation, in the same way crevice, hole and rock pool habitats do (Menge & Lubchenco 1981; Williams & Morritt 1995). They could also serve as corridors, connecting adjacent refuge habitats. The size and density of cavities or swimthroughs is likely to affect the size, abundance and variety of organisms that can use them. Small habitats can provide refuge for small-bodied organisms but may exclude larger organisms, limit their growth and get rapidly filled-up (Firth et al. 2020). Large habitats can be used by larger-bodied organisms but may not provide sufficient refuge from predators for smaller organisms. By default, cavities and swimthroughs contain shaded surfaces, which can be associated with the presence of non-native species (Dafforn 2017).
Cavities/swimthroughs are sometimes present on marine artificial structures made of consolidated boulders or blocks (Sherrard et al. 2016) or gabion baskets (Firth et al. 2014), but are absent from many other structures. Small adjoining cavities or ‘swimthrough’ habitats can be created on intertidal artificial structures by adding or removing material, either during construction or retrospectively.
See also: Create hole habitats (>50 mm) on intertidal artificial structures; Create crevice habitats (>50 mm) on intertidal artificial structures; Create ‘rock pools’ on intertidal artificial structures; Create large adjoining cavities or ‘swimthrough’ habitats (>100 mm) on intertidal artificial structures.
Dafforn K.A. (2017) Eco-engineering and management strategies for marine infrastructures to reduce establishment and dispersal of non-indigenous species. Management of Biological Invasions, 8, 153–161.
Firth L.B., Airoldi L., Bulleri F., Challinor S., Chee S.-Y., Evans A.J., Hanley M.E., Knights A.M., O’Shaughnessy K., Thompson R.C. & Hawkins S.J. (2020) Greening of grey infrastructure should not be used as a Trojan horse to facilitate coastal development. Journal of Applied Ecology, 57, 1762–1768.
Firth L.B., Thompson R.C., Bohn K., Abbiati M., Airoldi L., Bouma T.J., Bozzeda F., Ceccherelli V.U., Colangelo M.A., Evans A., Ferrario F., Hanley M.E., Hinz H., Hoggart S.P.G., Jackson J.E., Moore P., Morgan E.H., Perkol-Finkel S., Skov M.W., Strain E.M., van Belzen J. & Hawkins S.J. (2014) Between a rock and a hard place: environmental and engineering considerations when designing coastal defence structures. Coastal Engineering, 87, 122–135.
Menge B.A. & Lubchenco J. (1981) Community organization in temperate and tropical rocky intertidal habitats: prey refuges in relation to consumer pressure gradients. Ecological Monographs, 51, 429–450.
Sherrard T.R.W., Hawkins S.J., Barfield P., Kitou M., Bray S. & Osborne P.E. (2016) Hidden biodiversity in cryptic habitats provided by porous coastal defence structures. Coastal Engineering, 118, 12–20.
Williams G.A. & Morritt D. (1995) Habitat partitioning and thermal tolerance in a tropical limpet, Cellana grata. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 124, 89–103.
Supporting evidence from individual studies
A replicated study in 2011–2014 on 30 rock gabions on open coastline in the Irish Sea, UK and in the Eastern Scheldt estuary, Netherlands (Firth et al. 2014) found that gabions with small swimthrough habitats created amongst rocks of mixed sizes (small and large) supported similar macroalgae and invertebrate species richness and abundance to those amongst rocks of regular sizes (small or large), but that abundance was higher on gabions with regular small rocks than regular large ones. In the UK, after 12 months, 12 mobile and non-mobile invertebrate species were recorded in and on gabions with swimthroughs. Species richness and abundance was similar in and on gabions with swimthroughs amongst mixed-sized rocks (9 species/gabion, 252 individuals/gabion) and regularly-sized ones (8 species/gabion, 191–366 individuals/gabion). Abundance was higher in and on gabions with small regular rocks (366 individuals/gabion) than large regular ones (191/gabion). In the Netherlands, after 16 months, 14 macroalgae, mobile and non-mobile invertebrate species were recorded and overall species richness was similar on all gabion designs (data not reported). Small swimthrough habitats were created amongst rocks in gabion baskets (500 × 500 × 300 mm; 76 mm mesh size). Swimthroughs were either amongst rocks of mixed sizes (small: 60–100 mm and large: 180 mm), or amongst regularly-sized small or large rocks. Five of each design were placed at midshore on a boulder beach in the UK in April 2011 and at lower-midshore on a sandy beach in the Netherlands in September 2012. UK gabions were dismantled and invertebrates counted after 12 months. In the Netherlands, macroalgae and invertebrates on external horizontal gabion surfaces were counted after 16 months.Study and other actions tested
Referenced paperFirth L.B., Thompson R.C., Bohn K., Abbiati M., Airoldi L., Bouma T.J., Bozzeda F., Ceccherelli V.U., Colangelo M.A., Evans A.J., Ferrario F., Hanley M.E., Hinz H., Hoggart S.P.G., Jackson J.E., Moore P., Morgan E.H., Perkol-Finkel S., Skov M.W., Strain E.M., van Belzen J. & Hawkins S.J. (2014) Between a rock and a hard place: environmental and engineering considerations when designing coastal defence structures. Coastal Engineering, 87, 122-135.
A replicated, controlled study (year not reported) in two intertidal boulder fields on open coastline in the Indian Ocean, South Africa (Liversage et al. 2017) found that small swimthrough habitats created under concrete blocks supported similar mobile invertebrate species richness, diversity and community composition to blocks without swimthroughs, but higher mobile invertebrate abundance. Swimthrough habitats supported similar mobile invertebrate species richness, diversity and community composition (data reported as statistical model results) but higher mobile invertebrate abundance (3 individuals/dm2) compared with blocks without swimthroughs (1/dm2). Small swimthrough habitats (length: 290 mm; width: 70 mm; height: 20 mm) were created on the undersides of concrete blocks (250 × 150 × 40 mm) using a mould. Twelve blocks with swimthroughs and 12 without were placed on the seabed in each of two natural boulder-fields (material, shore level and month/year not reported). Mobile invertebrates on the horizontal surface (roof) of swimthrough habitats and on the equivalent undersurface of blocks without swimthroughs were counted from photographs after seven weeks. Some blocks were missing and no longer provided habitat (numbers not reported).Study and other actions tested
Where has this evidence come from?
List of journals searched by synopsis
All the journals searched for all synopses
This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:Biodiversity of Marine Artificial Structures
Biodiversity of Marine Artificial Structures - Published 2021
Enhancing biodiversity of marine artificial structures synopsis