Use noise aversive conditioning to deter mammals from fishing gear

How is the evidence assessed?
  • Effectiveness
    not assessed
  • Certainty
    not assessed
  • Harms
    not assessed

Source countries

Key messages

  • One study evaluated the effects on marine mammals of using noise aversive conditioning to deter mammals from fishing gear. The study was in the North Pacific Ocean (USA).

COMMUNITY RESPONSE (0 STUDIES)

POPULATION RESPONSE (0 STUDIES)

BEHAVIOUR (0 STUDIES)

OTHER (1 STUDY)

  • Human-wildlife conflict (1 study): One study in the North Pacific Ocean found that noise aversive conditioning did not reduce bait foraging behaviour by California sea lions.

About key messages

Key messages provide a descriptive index to studies we have found that test this intervention.

Studies are not directly comparable or of equal value. When making decisions based on this evidence, you should consider factors such as study size, study design, reported metrics and relevance of the study to your situation, rather than simply counting the number of studies that support a particular interpretation.

Supporting evidence from individual studies

  1. A controlled study in 2013–2014 of five pelagic areas in the North Pacific Ocean, off the coast of California, USA (Schakner et al. 2017) found that attempts to condition California sea lions Zalophus californianus to avoid fishing lines by pairing a ‘startle’ sound with a ‘neutral’ sound did not reduce bait foraging behaviour. Playing ‘startle’ sounds alone reduced sea lion bait foraging behaviour by 83% and sea lions surfaced three times further from fishing vessels compared to when no sounds were played (data reported as statistical model results). However, there was no significant difference in sea lion behaviour when ‘startle’ sounds were played after a ‘neutral’ tone. Commercial passenger fishing vessels carried out fishing stops (each 0.1–2 h) across five areas with sounds played back through an underwater speaker (98 stops) or with no sounds (48 stops). Sounds were either a ‘startle’ pulse (200 ms of white noise at 10–11 kHz) or a ‘startle’ pulse played 2 seconds after a ‘neutral’ tone (6-second tone at 1–2 kHz with a 1.5 second long fade-in). Sound treatments were randomly selected during each fishing stop. Two observers on board each of the fishing vessels recorded bait foraging (sea lions taking bait from fishing lines during at least 50% of the time spent fishing) and distances of surfacing sea lions from vessels during each of the 146 fishing stops in May–September 2013 and 2014.

    Study and other actions tested
Please cite as:

Berthinussen, A., Smith, R.K. and Sutherland, W.J. (2021) Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Interventions. Conservation Evidence Series Synopses. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Where has this evidence come from?

List of journals searched by synopsis

All the journals searched for all synopses

Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation

This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:

Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation
Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation

Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation - Published 2021

Marine and Freshwater Mammal Synopsis

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust