Establish ‘move-on rules’ for fishing vessels if mammals are encountered

How is the evidence assessed?
  • Effectiveness
    70%
  • Certainty
    27%
  • Harms
    0%

Source countries

Key messages

  • One study evaluated the effects on marine mammals of establishing move-on rules for fishing vessels if mammals are encountered. The study was in the Great Australian Bight (Australia).

COMMUNITY RESPONSE (0 STUDIES)

POPULATION RESPONSE (1 STUDY)

  • Survival (1 study): One before-and-after study in the Great Australian Bight found that introducing measures to delay or relocate fishing if dolphins were encountered, along with releasing trapped dolphins, resulted in fewer short-beaked common dolphins being encircled and killed.

BEHAVIOUR (0 STUDIES)

About key messages

Key messages provide a descriptive index to studies we have found that test this intervention.

Studies are not directly comparable or of equal value. When making decisions based on this evidence, you should consider factors such as study size, study design, reported metrics and relevance of the study to your situation, rather than simply counting the number of studies that support a particular interpretation.

Supporting evidence from individual studies

  1. A before-and-after study in 2004–2006 of a pelagic area in the Great Australian Bight, Australia (Hamer et al. 2008) found that introducing measures to delay or relocate fishing if dolphins were encountered, along with releasing dolphins trapped in nets, resulted in fewer short-beaked common dolphins Delphinus delphis being encircled and killed. The study did not distinguish between the effects of delaying/relocating fishing and releasing dolphins. Encirclement and mortality rates of dolphins in purse-seine nets were lower after the measures were put in place (0.2 dolphins encircled/net; 0.01 dolphins killed/net) than before (1.8 dolphins encircled/net; 0.4 dolphins killed/net). The measures were introduced to a sardine Sardinops sagax fishery in September 2005. At least one crew member/vessel was required to observe for dolphins. Fishing was delayed or relocated if dolphins were encountered. Release procedures included opening the net or a dolphin gate within the net, using weights to submerge the float line, physical removal of dolphins or stopping fishing. An independent observer recorded dolphin encirclements and deaths during 49 fishing events by eight vessels in November–June 2004/2005 (before the measures) and 89 fishing events by 12 vessels in November–June 2005/2006 (after).

    Study and other actions tested
Please cite as:

Berthinussen, A., Smith, R.K. and Sutherland, W.J. (2021) Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Interventions. Conservation Evidence Series Synopses. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Where has this evidence come from?

List of journals searched by synopsis

All the journals searched for all synopses

Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation

This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:

Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation
Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation

Marine and Freshwater Mammal Conservation - Published 2021

Marine and Freshwater Mammal Synopsis

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, terrestrial mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 18

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the evidence champions

Endangered Landscape Programme Red List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Save the Frogs - Ghana Bern wood Supporting Conservation Leaders National Biodiversity Network Sustainability Dashboard Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx British trust for ornithology Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Butterfly Conservation People trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust